We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Pooooplar in the pockets of Parking Lies??? :D
Comments
-
there is NO free get out of jail card , rules are rules
abide or leave , no delay , now!
anyway are POPLA bothered , there contract finishes in a few weeks/months0 -
The fact of the matter is that, with PE issuing around a third of all private parking tickets, they are never going to suffer any serious sanctions from the BPA, or the DVLA.
A 'senior source' at the DVLA is reported as saying that, short of breaking into Buckingham Palace and murdering the Queen's corgis, PE will not get their access to keeper data blocked.
I have been providing assistance, including Lay Representation at Court hearings (current score: won 57, lost 14), to defendants in parking cases for over 5 years. I have an LLB (Hons) degree, and have a Graduate Diploma in Civil Litigation from CILEx. However, any advice given on these forums by me is NOT formal legal advice, and I accept no liability for its accuracy.0 -
agreed , we can,t upset capita can we0
-
I love how PoPLA uses the term "adjournment", like they are a proper court!Je suis Charlie.0
-
Apologies for bumping this thread but was wondering if this could be used by people in receipt of invoices from PE and who request for their appeal to be stayed pending the outcome of the decision from the Supreme Court.
Surely what is good for one is good for another and the BPA certainly didn't mind this happening when the boot was on the other foot.
It could be argued that how can a defence be submitted when the legislation is in such a state of flux and PE could hardly argue when they set the precedence :rotfl:I Am Charlie0 -
the way I understand it , you or they can only ask for a "hold" once a case is allocated and a date set .
this was my first thoughts , and I asked and received a reply on pepipoo , stating more or less the above from someone in the "know"0 -
I do not see a problem. If PE want to quote Beavis, appellants can quote SC. Popla is only binding on PE anyway, and most of those case have been where their paper has been ignored.
Whether they can show that the charge is commercially justified to a judge or not, they still have to comply with all the other aspects of the event which have to be considered, i.e. timeliness, signage, locus, GPEOL where commercial justication does not apply, and the fact that judges can and do allow mitigation.
Beavis is far from being the final whistle.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0 -
And not forgetting the Equality Act which is strange with their car park management systems they can not pick up on!!!I Am Charlie0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards