We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Pooooplar in the pockets of Parking Lies??? :D
Comments
-
As it happens they meet tomorrow and this is on their agenda.Hi, we’ve approved your signature. It's awesome. Please email the forum team if you want more praise - MSE ForumTeam0
-
is there a chance , just a slim chance ,
pretty please0 -
POPLA adjourn cases on ParkingEye's request
so , PE are not able to offer an alternate dispute resolution ?
no longer eligible for BPA membership.0 -
Well, its an adjournment, so they are still offering ADR, just delayed ADR.
We should expect POPLA to dance to ParkingEye's tune. This is not the first time - remember the witness statements?Dedicated to driving up standards in parking0 -
adjournment or not , not right0
-
A civil claim being in the court of appeal is not good reason.0
-
A civil claim being in the court of appeal is not good reason.
correct , the agreement set up by the government was that a PPC had to be a member of an approved ATA , the BPA in this case set rules that PPCs have to abide by to be members , one of which is they have to offer an independent resolution system
PE are saying they don,t want popla to act , will issue no more POPLA codes , and asked that all codes are on hold.
they "might" just get away with the "on hold" ones , but refusing to issue a code is against BPA rules.
devil and the deep blue sea , BPA cannot afford to boot PE out ,
How can the bpa be doing what they were told to do by the government?
anyone getting a PE letter , ask for a popla code , and re ask , then complain like hell ,0 -
A civil claim being in the court of appeal is not good reason.
Why not? If it's a good enough reason for a circuit or district judge in county court I see no logical reason it is not a good enough reason for POPLA. Why shouldn't they wait until the law in this area is elucidated?
As for Parking Eye refusing to issue POPLA codes, where has it been said that they are doing that? All that has happened is that a number of cases already at POPLA have been adjourned pending the outcome of Parking Eye v Beavis.0 -
no over the last few weeks reports have been coming in that PE are not actually giving codes out and stalling people. they are obligated to give a code after refusing an appeal.
this is a level 4 sanction by the BPA resulting in 5 sanction points is this is proved to be "frequently"0 -
PE are indeed refusing appeals without giving out a POPLA code. No idea why. Perhaps they accidentally started using the wrong template letter.
The BPA are aware and investigating.
However, I expect ParkingEye to whip out their get-out-of-jail free card and escape without any sanctions.Dedicated to driving up standards in parking0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards