Pooooplar in the pockets of Parking Lies??? :D

trubster · 10 March 2015 at 9:49AM

Identities have been changed to prevent any defamation claims

Any similarities are purely coincidental

What do we think? This is purely comical

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/popla-delaying-parkingeye-assessments.html

DoaM · 10 March 2015 at 9:57AM

I think the thread title has the parties the wrong way around ... POOOPLA look to be in the pockets of Parking Lie.

trubster · 10 March 2015 at 9:59AM

DoaM wrote: »

I think the thread title has the parties the wrong way around ... POOOPLA look to be in the pockets of Parking Lie.

Title amended

Thanks for that

enfield_freddy · 10 March 2015 at 10:02AM

and who pays 90% of popla bills ?

gosh , what would happen if they moved to the IPS

DoaM · 10 March 2015 at 10:04AM

EF - you seem to make a lot of acronym errors.

IPS? Who are they?
IPA? (One you've used before). India Pale Ale?

trubster · 10 March 2015 at 10:07AM

enfield_freddy wrote: »

and who pays 100% of popla bills ?

The poor public that have been scammed by cowboys to pay "fines" that are worthless invoices

hoohoo · 10 March 2015 at 10:08AM

enfield_freddy wrote: »

and who pays 90% of popla bills ?

Apparently not the BPA who are quibbling about the latest set of invoices they got from POPLA.

trisontana · 10 March 2015 at 10:37AM

So on the one hand Parking Eye want to delay all their POPLA cases (even though they don't even submit evidence most of the time) until the Beavis appeal is known. On the other hand, they are in complete denial that the appeal is even going ahead judging by their website or the paperwork they send out to motorists.

bazster · 10 March 2015 at 10:39AM

This is so wrong. Before postponing an adjudication PoPLA ought at least to consider all the non-GPEOL-related appeal points which they customarily ignore. "Not a GPEOL" isn't the only potentially winning appeal point!