We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Top Table Arrangements - Tradition?

24

Comments

  • bylromarha
    bylromarha Posts: 10,085 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped!
    My dad died when I was 3. I never called the live in partner who moved in 6 months after dad died, "dad" - always by his first name. He wasn't someone I got on with particularly well.

    OH's mum had been divorced from OHs dad for 7 years. OHs dad wasn't invited to the wedding by choice of OH. OH's mum had a partner of 1 year by the point of our wedding.

    So! When we got married, on top table we had me and hubby. I sat next to OHs mum. He sat next to my mum. We had the best man, 2 ushers and 2 bridesmaids on the top table with us as well. We had 1 table for OH's mum's partner, sister and other close family. We had a 2nd table for my mum's partner, sister and other close family.

    My mum knew there was no point arguing she wasn't coming to the wedding if partner wasn't sitting at the top table as she knew that I'd rather not have her there than sit him at the top table.

    Ultimately, mum knew it was my day, not hers, so my wishes counted far more than hers. And having him sitting on the table close by would not have made for a very happy memory of the day for me.
    Who made hogs and dogs and frogs?
  • belfastgirl23
    belfastgirl23 Posts: 8,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    edited 8 March 2015 at 2:41PM
    It would be a bit weird for your mum sitting at the top table on her own whilst her partner sat elsewhere. If the bride's parents are non-negotiable then so are the groom's IMHO. It's either all of the parents or none of them. **edited to say I think the poster above managed it well because both mums had partners and could be treated equitably, I think it's trickier here because the bride does have two parents**

    I would have thought 11 at the top table (even before your mum) is way too much in any case (you both, her parents, 4 'best men' and 3 bridesmaids). It would need to be a big table lol.

    Either best men and bridesmaids only or parents only, your (shared) call I reckon.
  • bylromarha
    bylromarha Posts: 10,085 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped!
    If the bride's parents are non-negotiable then so are the groom's IMHO. It's either all of the parents or none of them. **edited to say I think the poster above managed it well because both mums had partners and could be treated equitably, I think it's trickier here because the bride does have two parents**

    I don't think it is trickier here - parents are different to partners IMO.
    Who made hogs and dogs and frogs?
  • SmlSave
    SmlSave Posts: 4,911 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    We didn't have a top table. We had 3 large tables and we sat at each one for a course which worked well, no one felt left out. Only had 30 people for the day though
    Currently studying for a Diploma - wish me luck :)

    Phase 1 - Emergency Fund - Complete :j
    Phase 2 - £20,000 Mortgage Fund - Underway
  • belfastgirl23
    belfastgirl23 Posts: 8,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    bylromarha wrote: »
    I don't think it is trickier here - parents are different to partners IMO.

    Of course they're different. But at the same time the OPs mum did not choose to be widowed. It underlines her loss to make her sit up there on her own IMHO. Weddings can be a tricky enough time anyway when you miss the people who aren't there. I wouldn't feel comfortable emphasising it more.
  • onlyroz
    onlyroz Posts: 17,661 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Which is why we went for a buffet ;)
  • onlyroz
    onlyroz Posts: 17,661 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    KxMx wrote: »
    It's not really down to your Mum.
    Unless, perhaps, mum is contributing a significant amount towards the cost :p
  • Bella73
    Bella73 Posts: 547 Forumite
    Hi all,

    Does anyone know what the tradition is for a wedding top table when one parent is deceased?

    My dad died when I was young, and my mum has now got a new partner. To be honest he's a bit of a waster, and mum could do much much better. But mum is insisting he sits at the top table with us.
    Vanessa's got both her parents and three bridesmaids to seat, as well as two best men and two ushers.

    Some have suggested just the bridal party on the top table and have a second table for 'parents and close family'.

    Any ideas?

    Ta
    Martin

    If you wish to follow true tradition then the etiquette is to ask your Mum what she would like to do, be that sit at the top table alone or have her new partner/friend or if you have a sibling to be her "partner" in the seating plan.

    It is not usual to have all the ushers and bridesmaids on the top table, only the best man and the chief bridesmaid.
  • meritaten
    meritaten Posts: 24,158 Forumite
    my DDs Top Table arrangements were: her 3yr old bridesmaid DD, her MIL and her Partner, the Best Man, Groom, Bride, Brides Dad and mum, Grooms father and Partner, Son. her MILs partner and her FIL were kept as far apart as possible, while on same table. it worked great!
  • ThinkPink
    ThinkPink Posts: 893 Forumite
    We decided to have a round table as our 'top table'.

    I had previously been chief bridesmaid and was sat next to my friends fil who hardly spoke to me and was also the complete opposite side of the room to anyone I knew and it just didn't feel sociable so I didn't want this for my wedding party.

    Due to both sets of parents being divorced we decided to sit with chief bridesmaid, her boyfriend, best man, a couple we are really good friends with and another really good friend- it saved any debates and we had a good laugh, and it meant no couples were separated.

    It's sometimes easier to go against tradition!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.