We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Working tax credits self employed

1356713

Comments

  • nannytone wrote: »
    is it just me or does this not sound like a business?
    there is little stock available, and he doesn't sell the stock he hholds in case he can't source any more?
    so ge spends 40 hours a week trying to find stock ( over a 2 month period) and yet has only found £750 worth ( £375 a month) and hasn't sold any of it on.
    i wouldn't want to invest in him


    My clients business has been considered viable as he has had the business signed off and approved by an external provider contracted by the DWP ( Job centre )
  • NYM
    NYM Posts: 4,066 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    My clients business has been considered viable as he has had the business signed off and approved by an external provider contracted by the DWP ( Job centre )


    Did he apply for the NEA Scheme ?
  • Yes my Client is on the NEA Scheme.After advice from a few sources he was told that the business would qualify for WTC hence he has gone ahead with the business. IF WTC is refused then the business will have to cease trading and will have to go back on JSA until a employed position is found. Shame really as he doesnt want a life on the dole.

    A loan from a bank or the NEA loan is not possible due to adverse credit rating, which resulted from him being unable to pay his debts after losing his job. Catch 22 situation
  • tomtontom
    tomtontom Posts: 7,929 Forumite
    Yes my Client is on the NEA Scheme.After advice from a few sources he was told that the business would qualify for WTC hence he has gone ahead with the business. IF WTC is refused then the business will have to cease trading and will have to go back on JSA until a employed position is found. Shame really as he doesnt want a life on the dole.

    A loan from a bank or the NEA loan is not possible due to adverse credit rating, which resulted from him being unable to pay his debts after losing his job. Catch 22 situation

    You miss the point - would he pursue this route if he did not have tax credits to fall back on? If you were advising him in a professional capacity would you agree it was viable?
  • ohreally
    ohreally Posts: 7,525 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 6 March 2015 at 7:18PM
    The sooner WTC is brought to an end the better. Most abate used to prop up business models that are propped up by tax payers supporting low wage employers or inviable self employed schemes like this one.
    Don’t be a can’t, be a can.
  • No he would not have started this business without the WTC payments.As the business plan was produced taking the WTC payments into account for the cashflow.

    WORKING TAX CREDITS THE BUSINESS/CASHFLOW IS VIABLE

    NO WORKING TAX CREDITS THE BUSINESS/CASHFLOW IS NOT VIABLE.
  • tomtontom
    tomtontom Posts: 7,929 Forumite
    No he would not have started this business without the WTC payments.As the business plan was produced taking the WTC payments into account for the cashflow.

    WORKING TAX CREDITS THE BUSINESS/CASHFLOW IS VIABLE

    NO WORKING TAX CREDITS THE BUSINESS/CASHFLOW IS NOT VIABLE.

    Then you have your answer - the plan is not viable. A business cannot be built around benefit dependency.
  • It is only not viable if the WTC payments are not included in the business. However, the business was only started as it was confirmed by the Job centre that the business would receive these payments hence the business was started.
  • dktreesea
    dktreesea Posts: 5,736 Forumite
    ohreally wrote: »
    The sooner WTC is brought to an end the better. Most abate used to prop up business models that are propped up by tax payers supporting low wage employers or inviable self employed schemes like this one.


    If the NMW were sufficient to live on, WTC wouldn't be needed. Keep in mind by and large it's employees who claim it, not the self employed.
  • dktreesea
    dktreesea Posts: 5,736 Forumite
    tomtontom wrote: »
    Then you have your answer - the plan is not viable. A business cannot be built around benefit dependency.


    Seriously? Which country do you live in? That's the rest of the world you're referring to, not here.


    People, say, going from DWP and job seekers allowance to self employment are often doing so to protect their current benefits entitlement. Keep in mind these people usually have very little capital to invest. So the viablitiy of their business in the early stages is likely to be marginal at best.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.