We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Conveyancing query: can the freeholder not be the lessor?

Nez*
Posts: 4 Newbie
Yesterday I received the copies of the title registers for a flat I have purchased. I am confused over the why the lessor is not the freeholder. I am talking to my solicitor about this on Monday, but I would like any background information in the meantime.
Let me explain:
- My flat is one of two in a Victorian conversion. Let's call mine Flat A, and the other Flat B.
- The previous owner (Owner P) owned the whole house (although it had been two separate flats for over 30 years).
- Owner P sold on the two flats separately at approximately the same time to me (Owner Q, Flat A) and another (Owner R, Flat
.
I have received two copies of the title register:
1. The freehold title for the whole house, which has Owner Q and Owner R listed as proprietors (as expected).
2. The leasehold title, for Flat A, which lists the parties as Owner P and Owner Q, and the proprietor as Owner Q. The lease is 999 years.
(The lease itself lists Owner P as the Landlord, and Owner Q as the tenant.)
I would have thought that Q and R, as the joint freeholders, would be the lessor? This is what I expected to happen. Can anyone shed some light on whether this is normal, or not?
Let me explain:
- My flat is one of two in a Victorian conversion. Let's call mine Flat A, and the other Flat B.
- The previous owner (Owner P) owned the whole house (although it had been two separate flats for over 30 years).
- Owner P sold on the two flats separately at approximately the same time to me (Owner Q, Flat A) and another (Owner R, Flat

I have received two copies of the title register:
1. The freehold title for the whole house, which has Owner Q and Owner R listed as proprietors (as expected).
2. The leasehold title, for Flat A, which lists the parties as Owner P and Owner Q, and the proprietor as Owner Q. The lease is 999 years.
(The lease itself lists Owner P as the Landlord, and Owner Q as the tenant.)
I would have thought that Q and R, as the joint freeholders, would be the lessor? This is what I expected to happen. Can anyone shed some light on whether this is normal, or not?
0
Comments
-
Let me explain:
- My flat is one of two in a Victorian conversion. Let's call mine Flat A, and the other Flat B.
- The previous owner (Owner P) owned the whole house (although it had been two separate flats for over 30 years).
- Owner P sold on the two flats separately at approximately the same time to me (Owner Q, Flat A) and another (Owner R, Flat.
So Q owns the lease to flat A
R owns the lease to flat B
I have received two copies of the title register:
1. The freehold title for the whole house, which has Owner Q and Owner R listed as proprietors (as expected).
So you and the other leaseholder, jointly own the freehold
2. The leasehold title, for Flat A, which lists the parties as Owner P and Owner Q,??? I suspect this is NOT the 'leasehold Title (ie Land Registry Title). This is the original lease.
and the proprietor as Owner Q. Yes, you currently own the lease
The lease is 999 years.
(The lease itself lists Owner P as the Landlord, and Owner Q as the tenant.)Yes. P created the lease and sold it to you - you became the leaseholder (tenant).
I would have thought that Q and R, as the joint freeholders, would be the lessor?
The original lease was created by P.
The lease for flat A was sold to you, and at same time the freehold was sold to you & flat B (Q & R).
This is what I expected to happen. Can anyone shed some light on whether this is normal, or not?
There are various legal documents:
* the original lease: granted by P to Q (this will never change for 999 years)
* the leasehold Title : currently owned by Q (but you could sell it to Z!)
* the freehold Title : currently owned by Q & R ( but could be sold)0 -
The Lease states the original parties and doesn't get updated with a change of ownership. The freehold and leasehold title registers will tell you who the current parties to the Lease are.0
-
2. The leasehold title, for Flat A, which lists the parties as Owner P and Owner Q,??? I suspect this is NOT the 'leasehold Title (ie Land Registry Title). This is the original lease.
It is in fact the leasehold title, which is why I'm confused. Here's what it says:
"A. Property register....
....
2. Short particulars of the lease(s) (or under-lease(s) under which the land is held):
....
Parties: (1) Owner P
(2) Owner Q
...
...
B. Proprietorship Register
....
Title absolute
1. PROPRIETOR: Owner Q
..."
The leasehold title was issued on 19 Feb, and the freehold on 23 Feb.0 -
The Lease states the original parties and doesn't get updated with a change of ownership. The freehold and leasehold title registers will tell you who the current parties to the Lease are.
So, the fact the the lease lists the old owners of the property (Owner P) as the landlord/lessor is now irrelevant as the leasehold title register part B over-rides the names on the lease?0 -
It is in fact the leasehold title, which is why I'm confused. Here's what it says:
"A. Property register....
....
2. Short particulars of the lease(s) (or under-lease(s) under which the land is held):
....
Parties: (1) Owner P
(2) Owner Q
as I said: this relates to the original lease which was created
...
...
B. Proprietorship Register
....
Title absolute
1. PROPRIETOR: Owner Q
..."
This is the current owner of the lease.
The leasehold title was issued on 19 Feb, and the freehold on 23 Feb.So, the fact the the lease lists the old owners of the property (Owner P) as the landlord/lessor is now irrelevant as the leasehold title register part B over-rides the names on the lease?
You may sell it on. It may be sold another 32 times, and the 33 owners will be listed as leaseholders on the leasehold Title for the duration of time each owns it.
But the lease itself will still record the the fact that it was created in whatever year, by P & Q.0 -
I think others have explained this already but the register and lease should be read in conjunction to understand the current ownership and the lease details
The purpose of the A Property Register entry re the 'short particulars of the lease' is simply to enable you to know that you are looking at the correct lease so it will refer to the date, terms and original parties
So if you want to know who owns the lease and it's leasehold title then look at the B Proprietorship Register of the leasehold register
If you want to who owns the freehold title then look at the B Proprietorship Register of the freehold register“Official Company Representative
I am the official company representative of Land Registry. MSE has given permission for me to post in response to queries about the company, so that I can help solve issues. You can see my name on the companies with permission to post list. I am not allowed to tout for business at all. If you believe I am please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com This does NOT imply any form of approval of my company or its products by MSE"0 -
Land_Registry_representative wrote: »The purpose of the A Property Register entry re the 'short particulars of the lease' is simply to enable you to know that you are looking at the correct lease so it will refer to the date, terms and original parties
So if you want to know who owns the lease and it's leasehold title then look at the B Proprietorship Register of the leasehold register
So the owner of the lease in B proprietorship of the leasehold register now becomes the lessor, and the previous person names as the lessor in the lease (owner P), now has nothing to do with all this? This would now make sense.
Thanks G_M and the land registry representative for your replies, this has helped my understanding (I think!) of property law.0 -
So the owner of the lease in B proprietorship of the leasehold register now becomes the lessor,
correct. And this name changes every time the lease (flat) is sold
and the previous person names as the lessor in the lease (owner P), now has nothing to do with all this?
they remain the original person to whom the lease was granted, and will therefore remain named on the original lease. The lease is not re-issued each time there is a sale. It (the original lease) is sold just as it is, so the wording, including th names, remains unchangd.
This would now make sense.
Thanks G_M and the land registry representative for your replies, this has helped my understanding (I think!) of property law.0 -
What happens when the lease expires in 999 years? Can the leaseholder then throw the freeholder out?0
-
I thought it might be because you cannot lease to yourself?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards