We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
EE out of warranty - phone issues
Comments
-
What difference does this make?
Is it not the same for cars, toys and many other goods with batteries?
Printers with cartridges? ....
A week is not a reasonable time for a mobile phone battery to last. 1 year is a reasonable time.
"Reasonable" is the term used in the SoGA.
I'd ask what a reasonable time period for a phone to last is, not the battery. At no point did you buy a battery. You bought a phone imo. I understand what you're getting at though0 -
S
'Separately' is a too ambiguous term. I've never seen a printer sold without cartridge(s).nickthegreat wrote: »with those examples they are sold separately
Non-removable doesn't mean non-replaceable. Very few people DIY replacing break pads or oil filter in their cars. Majority can't replace even the battery and will seek help from a garage or a shop.phone batteries are integral (and frequently non removeable) parts of a product you bought.
I don't agree.and again, fit for purpose seems to imply the duration of the contract.
Networks vigorously deny that Supply of Goods and Services Act is applicable, but even if it is, it doesn't cover consumables.
This doesn't make any difference for your rights.although technically i guess they could claim they never sold you the phone, it was a gift....0 -
fair enough, but i still contend that even if you do split the product, one year is still no where near reasonable. it wouldn't take much to prove that this is nowhere near the norm. and i'd still argue with them about the all in one nature of the product, but that's just meNon-removable doesn't mean non-replaceable. Very few people DIY replacing break pads or oil filter in their cars. Majority can't replace even the battery and will seek help from a garage or a shop.
that strikes me as an incredibly loose definition of a consumable! eitherway, its interesting to know that's the view they take.I don't agree.
Networks vigorously deny that Supply of Goods and Services Act is applicable, but even if it is, it doesn't cover consumables.
This doesn't make any difference for your rights.0 -
Maybe next time, buy a handset with a warranty at least matching your contract duration.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
