Combined Parking Solutions Ltd - County Court Claim Form

The_Deep

I have had another pm from the OP, apparently the invoices make no mention of v.a.t.

I have again urged her to put the invoices up on here; hopefully we will know more soon.

Allieowen

Hopefully this link will work.

First letter received, doesn't actually say its a "notice to keeper"

https:-//flic.kr/p/qSuRLw (Copy and remove the "-")

Allieowen

the second page.

https:-//flic.kr/p/qUCUEK (Copy and remove the "-")

Allieowen

Second ticket - First letter

https:-//flic.kr/p/qUMRhP (remove the "-")

noticed first letter CPA member of BPA
second letter member of IPC

Allieowen

Second page.

https:-//flic.kr/p/qCdogE (remove the "-")

Ralph-y

Copy of first letter received Hopefully this link will work.

First letter received, doesn't actually say its a "notice to keeper"


https://www.flickr.com/photos/59270060@N03/16324017786/

the second page.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/59270060@N03/16348221431/
Second ticket - First letter



noticed first letter CPA member of BPA
second letter member of IPC


https://www.flickr.com/photos/59270060@N03/16349966075/

Second page.

[URL]htthttps://www.flickr.com/photos/59270060@N03/16162372548/p://[/URL]

esmerobbo

As this is now in an open forum the Piemaster will go all the way with this, he does enjoy a day in court. So unless you pay you really need to work on a defence.

They are claiming the person parked there for an agreed amount. The driver/keeper now has to show that the offer was not conveyed adequately, or the amount is an unfair term.

A District Judge wont give a rats ar5e over anything to do with VAT being chargeable or not.

As I posted earlier CPS choose their cases well, they no doubt lose money doing court case's but the Pieman receives some sort of buzz from appearing at court.

The_Deep

A District Judge wont give a rats ar5e over anything to do with VAT being chargeable or not.

Perhaps not, but he may disallow the case on GPEOL as, unless v.a.t. has been accounted for, it cannot be a contractual charge.

You seem to have far more respect for this company than I have, they win their cases, (not many), because they go up against dummies.

esmerobbo

The_Deep wrote: »

A District Judge wont give a rats ar5e over anything to do with VAT being chargeable or not.

Perhaps not, but he may disallow the case on GPEOL as, unless v.a.t. has been accounted for, it cannot be a contractual charge.

You seem to have far more respect for this company than I have, they win their cases, (not many), because they go up against dummies.

I have no respect at all for this company at all, and we go back a loooooooong time.
Yes he wins a few that's why I said he chooses them well!

You do not always need to produce a VAT receipt. I had several businesses were I paid VAT on sales but didn't need to produce a VAT receipt.

The_Deep

You do not always need to produce a VAT receipt. I had several businesses were I paid VAT on sales but didn't need to produce a VAT receipt.

Indeed, but have you read this?

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5087925=

Yes he wins a few. He beat Stephen Thomas who went on a forum and admitted being the driver. Later in court he tried to claim he was not driving, of course the judge found for perky.

How would he fare I wonder against a well constructed defence, especially if his mark was the victim of a perverse IAS decision which was later produced in court..