sorry another G24 question

Coupon-mad

Yep, can see that picture. G24 now make a better attempt at a NTK than some. I think draft an IAS appeal - in your son's name but your name also added as his advocate/mother, based around the argument he cannot be held liable because:

- he cannot drive due to his severe learning difficulties so cannot be lawfully pursued as keeper.
- he cannot sign any documents nor enter into any contracts so he cannot name the driver, and cannot be held liable as keeper either, due to the protection offered to him within the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (quote from it).
- if G24 do not cease and desist with this communication they will be liable for damages payable to him.

Annoyingly, to get IAS to cancel - due to the way their terrible kangaroo court works - you would 'have to' also attach 'evidence' that you are telling the truth about his mental incapacity and inability to drive. Horrible isn't it - why should they have that?

Hot_Bring

cat410 wrote: »

http://tinypic.com/2mpmioli

As expected Excercise4less were lying to you - G24 do not own that land. Brockton Pradera Retail LP own it. I would imagine BPR hired G24. Therefore it's time to go all guns blazing in to the CEO of BPR.

Here's his email address - [EMAIL="james.bury@pradera.com"]james.bury@pradera.com[/EMAIL]

You might want to copy in the person responsible for that particular retail park - here's his email address - danny.al-dilmi@pradera.com

Don't ask them to get the charge cancelled - DEMAND it is and be forceful.

The_Deep

... to get IAS to cancel - due to the way their terrible kangaroo court works - you would 'have to' also attach 'evidence' that you are telling the truth about his mental incapacity and inability to drive. ...

So do not do it. Lose the appeal, it is no big deal. Lets get this show on the road CM, stop all this appeasement malarkey.

bazster

The_Deep wrote: »

... to get IAS to cancel - due to the way their terrible kangaroo court works - you would 'have to' also attach 'evidence' that you are telling the truth about his mental incapacity and inability to drive. ...

So do not do it. Lose the appeal, it is no big deal. Lets get this show on the road CM, stop all this appeasement malarkey.

I agree, it's bad enough dancing to their tune in the ordinary course of events but in this case I would absolutely NOT let the scum be privy to medical information concerning your son. Simply state in your appeal that your son is severely disabled - along the lines suggested by C-M - but don't provide any evidence and let them show their true, repulsive colours by rejecting in their usual sarcastic and unprofessional manner.

You local press should then have a field day with it, and you might even get the Daily Mail and your MP to take an interest.

cat410

my worry with appealing to IAS is, I have already appealed to G24 stating I was at the gym and I have received a charge notice. SO basically, have already admitted it was me driving. After a nasty email to the gym, they have advised they are in the process of speaking to the landlord of the car park to see what can be done. I have also been onto my local paper, who is quite keen to do a write up on this. She is just waiting for me to give the go ahead.

Fruitcake

cat410 wrote: »

my worry with appealing to IAS is, I have already appealed to G24 stating I was at the gym and I have received a charge notice. SO basically, have already admitted it was me driving. After a nasty email to the gym, they have advised they are in the process of speaking to the landlord of the car park to see what can be done. I have also been onto my local paper, who is quite keen to do a write up on this. She is just waiting for me to give the go ahead.

But you said in a previous post that you hadn't revealed who was driving.


"In my appeal, I stated that we had received a charge, but didnt admit who the driver was. The rejection email was received yesterday, so 20 days left."


So you appealed on behalf of the keeper as their legal guardian. Therefore appeal to IAS using the same words. State that the keeper isn't capable of doing this themselves but neither IAS or the PPC have a right to know something so private and personal as your son's medical details.

cat410

yes, sorry. My appeal didnt actually state 'I was driving', I wrote, I have received a charge notice when I was in the gym. As a full time carer, I use the gym when I can and often multiple classes. Is it not obvious to them, that I was driving?

cat410

I have also asked BPA to investigate Breach of Code of Practice, as G24 have obtained personal details from DVLA, when they are not an approved BPA member.

Redx

BPA will tell you they are no longer a member, so would have used their IPC membership to access the dvla database (you were already told this on page one)

the BPA hold no powers over them since they transferred to the IPC a few months ago

obviously, you should not have told G24 you were the driver, but too late now, so you deal with this as driver if you have already admitted it , providing it was YOU that received this NTK (and not your son)

bazster

cat410 wrote: »

yes, sorry. My appeal didnt actually state 'I was driving', I wrote, I have received a charge notice when I was in the gym. As a full time carer, I use the gym when I can and often multiple classes. Is it not obvious to them, that I was driving?

Doesn't matter, they've sent a Notice to Keeper to your son so you are appealing it on his behalf.