We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

End of tenancy - tenant still there but has somewhere else to live

1246

Comments

  • It's all so effing wrong the way the law is stacked against landlords.

    Allows tenants to take the p*ss knowing there is nothing that the landlord can do.
    :jTo be Young AGAIN!!!!...what a wonderfull thought!!!!!:rolleyes:
  • 45002
    45002 Posts: 802 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    It's all so effing wrong the way the law is stacked against landlords.

    Allows tenants to take the p*ss knowing there is nothing that the landlord can do.

    Rubbish...

    1988 Housing act change that with AST and s21 notice !

    It's all now favour of LLs....
    Advice given on Assured and Regulated Tenancy, Further advice should always be sought from a Solicitor....
  • domcastro
    domcastro Posts: 643 Forumite
    edited 24 December 2014 at 8:00PM
    45002 wrote: »
    Rubbish...

    1988 Housing act change that with AST and s21 notice !

    It's all now favour of LLs....

    Not true. I've been a tenant for 15 years and a landlord for 3 years. It's been awful being a landlord and the law is definitely on the tenant's side, from my personal experience

    I was a "good" (mug) landlord too - I didn't even increase his rent in 3 years and did all repairs straight away
    s21 - what the piece of paper they can ignore?
  • 45002
    45002 Posts: 802 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    domcastro wrote:
    Not true. I've been a tenant for 15 years and a landlord for 3 years. It's been awful being a landlord and the law is definitely on the tenant's side, from my personal experience

    s21 - what the piece of paper they can ignore? so then pay 100s in court costs and mortgage payments for them to do a runner and declare themselves bankrupt?



    While it's the letting agent that's let you down in your personal experience, perhaps you should be suing letting agent as well !

    The law is definitely on LL side since 1988 Housing act and s21.

    Some reading for you http://england.shelter.org.uk/news/march_2014/shelter_exposes_true_scale_of_revenge_evictions

    Happy Xmas All....
    :beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer:
    Advice given on Assured and Regulated Tenancy, Further advice should always be sought from a Solicitor....
  • It's a bad few tenants that give everyone a bad name.

    I have one living next door to me at the moment.

    I know the landlord quite well because he use to live in the property. He is so stressed about this guy and so frustrated about the law being stacked against him.

    To cut a long story short he rented the property to this guys girlfriend, she provided all the references and deposit, but he gave them a joint tenancy as asked.

    She paid the rent to the LL for 2 months, no issues.

    2 months later they have split up, she walked out with no notice saying he would continue the tenancy.

    The LL tried his hardest to set up a single tenancy with this guy and he just point blank refused.

    It's been a few months now since she left and he has not paid a penny in rent, is abusive to the LL when asked for rent and refusing to move out. On top of that he has done damage to the property.

    In situations like this where no kids are involved, the LL should be legally allowed to kick him out after 2/3 months notice.

    Instead all the LL gets is red tape and eviction process that takes months to complete.
    :jTo be Young AGAIN!!!!...what a wonderfull thought!!!!!:rolleyes:
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    domcastro wrote: »
    I have been paying a full management fee to an agent, who as it turned out has been awful. I hadn't been to the property for 3 years - they had 2 dogs and 3 cats, the garden was so overgrown that you couldn't see the shed. And there was no handle on the front door or key hole and stains on carpets. And the tenant is 3 months in arrears. I'm selling the house and just want rid. The agents are useless and just trying to get money out of me - I've had enough. I was an "accidental" landlord and just want rid and move on. This was why I was going to let the arrears go - more because I just want it all over. I have a buyer for the house and the tenant was surprisingly helpful and cooperative so this also made me more generous. But really, the tenant and agents have taken me for a mug! kind of funny - being a landlord is not for me.

    He's got another place but is taking ages moving from one to another. I just hope he's out on the 29th, I can get a lock fitted and tidy up for the buyers.

    Your misding the point. Even if he's out on the 29th, the tenancy isn't finished... Listen to what your being told :)
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    domcastro wrote: »
    Not true. I've been a tenant for 15 years and a landlord for 3 years. It's been awful being a landlord and the law is definitely on the tenant's side, from my personal experience

    I was a "good" (mug) landlord too - I didn't even increase his rent in 3 years and did all repairs straight away
    s21 - what the piece of paper they can ignore?

    Omg - glad your leaving the game :)

    A s21 is notice of intent to begin court proceedings, not notice to quit...

    The law is on the LLs side, if you know it. Don't be offended, clearly not for you this being a landlord malarkey.
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    It's a bad few tenants that give everyone a bad name.

    I have one living next door to me at the moment.

    I know the landlord quite well because he use to live in the property. He is so stressed about this guy and so frustrated about the law being stacked against him.

    To cut a long story short he rented the property to this guys girlfriend, she provided all the references and deposit, but he gave them a joint tenancy as asked.

    She paid the rent to the LL for 2 months, no issues.

    2 months later they have split up, she walked out with no notice saying he would continue the tenancy.

    The LL tried his hardest to set up a single tenancy with this guy and he just point blank refused.

    It's been a few months now since she left and he has not paid a penny in rent, is abusive to the LL when asked for rent and refusing to move out. On top of that he has done damage to the property.

    In situations like this where no kids are involved, the LL should be legally allowed to kick him out after 2/3 months notice.

    Instead all the LL gets is red tape and eviction process that takes months to complete.

    'Should' - speak to your MP

    Your friend just needs to issue a s8 notice and sue them BOTH for the rent arrears.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Why on earth would you 'write off' thousands of pounds of rent, and let the T get away with this.

    Evict properly, by all means possible - not just one. ie S21 then court AND S8 + court. If one fails the other will succeed.

    Then sue for the rent arrears.
  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 26 December 2014 at 12:57PM
    It's a bad few tenants that give everyone a bad name.

    I have one living next door to me at the moment.

    I know the landlord quite well because he use to live in the property. He is so stressed about this guy and so frustrated about the law being stacked against him.

    To cut a long story short he rented the property to this guys girlfriend, she provided all the references and deposit, but he gave them a joint tenancy as asked.

    She paid the rent to the LL for 2 months, no issues.

    2 months later they have split up, she walked out with no notice saying he would continue the tenancy.

    The LL tried his hardest to set up a single tenancy with this guy and he just point blank refused.

    It's been a few months now since she left and he has not paid a penny in rent, is abusive to the LL when asked for rent and refusing to move out. On top of that he has done damage to the property.

    In situations like this where no kids are involved, the LL should be legally allowed to kick him out after 2/3 months notice.

    Instead all the LL gets is red tape and eviction process that takes months to complete.

    What did your former neighbour expect if he couldn't be bothered referencing and checking out both tenants before giving them a joint tenancy? Referencing isn't foolproof but if you can't be bothered to do it at all don't be shocked if you end up with a crappy tenant. The saving grace is that, despite her moving out, he has two people to pursue for rent arrears and damages. Let's just hope he managed to get the rest of his responsibilities right or he could be up the proverbial creek without a paddle.

    If a tenant is in rent arrears then all he has to do is issue a Section 8. He could go down the belt and braces route and issue a Section 21 too. If any future landlords contact him for a reference about either of this pair he should be honest to save another landlord the headache of dealing with them.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.