Estate agent Haart shows drop of 14% in south-west London in November

padington

Bubble_and_Squeak wrote: »

is that a 14% drop in a month or a year?
either way it sounds too much to be true
must be skewed by a glut of shared ownership rat cages or something

All it means is they had a lot of high end property's on the books. There are lots of prime properties even in places like tower hamlets and that can skew the results.

chewmylegoff

Joeskeppi wrote: »

You have to compare it with a crack den in outer Edinburgh, in which case it's a palace.

I can't decide if I should contine following the Foxtons Share Price House Price Index or this new Haart House Price Index instead. Both seem incredibly accurate.

I prefer to make the data more accurate by dividing the asking price of a randomly selected property from Haart's website by Foxton's P/E ratio which gives me the real price (ex-BOMAD) of a 3 bed terrace in walthamstow.

chucknorris

chewmylegoff wrote: »

I prefer to make the data more accurate by dividing the asking price of a randomly selected property from Haart's website by Foxton's P/E ratio which gives me the real price (ex-BOMAD) of a 3 bed terrace in walthamstow.

While this makes a lot of sense, surely you should multiply it by (the sun+moon)/24 hours) to give an average any time of day hourly answer? (apologies to those who work in minutes rather than hours, but I'm sure you can work out the adjustment)

mystic_trev

Personally I use the Bruce Banner Index (BBI) from HPC. It's seasonally adjusted by Elves working for Santa Claus :santa2: and double checked and audited by Fairies at the bottom of my garden.

Crashy_Time

http://www.introducertoday.co.uk/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=970:london-demand-plunges-as-buyers-flee-capital&Itemid=583


More bad data?

Crashy_Time

chucknorris wrote: »

While this makes a lot of sense, surely you should multiply it by (the sun+moon)/24 hours) to give an average any time of day hourly answer? (apologies to those who work in minutes rather than hours, but I'm sure you can work out the adjustment)

Is it wrong to mock a bubble as it bursts Chucky? Is it wrong to mock those who cling to it for their self worth? :rotfl:

chucknorris

Crashy_Time wrote: »

Is it wrong to mock a bubble as it bursts Chucky? Is it wrong to mock those who cling to it for their self worth? :rotfl:

How many times do I have to tell you that I am not chucky, he is probably still on the website (after being banned) but he is someone else!

Bubble_and_Squeak

Crashy_Time wrote: »

Is it wrong to mock a bubble as it bursts Chucky? Is it wrong to mock those who cling to it for their self worth? :rotfl:

my dear crashy, you underestimate the ability of the current administration to re-inflate a bursting bubble!

Bubble_and_Squeak

chucknorris wrote: »

How many times do I have to tell you that I am not chucky, he is probably still on the website (after being banned) but he is someone else!

you're coming like danny!

Crashy_Time

chucknorris wrote: »

How many times do I have to tell you that I am not chucky, he is probably still on the website (after being banned) but he is someone else!

Ok, fair enough. What do you think of the link I posted, rubbish or relevant?