IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Iffy uk cps windscreen ticket

Options
13»

Comments

  • barold
    barold Posts: 31 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    Umkomaas wrote: »
    GPEOL -
    NtK should arrive between days 29 and 56 after the parking event IF they are to claim Keeper Liability (KL). But UKCPS have recently joined the IPC (no longer a BPA member) so they may have changed tack on KL. You'll just need to see what comes through the post
    .



    NTK arrived today, have first stage appeal ready to print off.


    You mentioned UKCPS have joined IPC (the logo IS on the park signs I was at) and may have changed tack re keeper liability.


    what should I be looking for on ntk?


    thanks
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 43,416 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Are they quoting PoFA 2012, or 'holding the keeper liable' or are they using words to the effect 'a reasonable assumption the you, the keeper, were the driver on the day'?
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • barold
    barold Posts: 31 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    edited 28 January 2015 at 6:49PM
    Umkomaas wrote: »
    Are they quoting PoFA 2012, or 'holding the keeper liable' or are they using words to the effect 'a reasonable assumption the you, the keeper, were the driver on the day'?





    Thanks for your reply.




    I've selected the bits of the ntk relative to your asking.




    Dear (keepers name)


    the driver of the above vehicle is liable for a parking charge in the above amount


    We, the above named Co (UKCPS), are the creditor. At the time of this notice we do not know the name or current address of the driver. So, as registered keeper of the vehicle...

    we invite you to
    pay the parking charge, or
    if you were not the driver, tell us their name and address, so we can serve them. You should also pass this notice to the driver.


    There is no reference to PoFA 2012, and nothing specific saying they will assume the keeper was the driver.
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 43,416 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Thanks for clarifying that. Just send off the initial appeal from the sticky now.
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • barold
    barold Posts: 31 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    Umkomaas wrote: »
    Thanks for clarifying that. Just send off the initial appeal from the sticky now.



    No, indeed thank you.


    one last point before I post.....




    In the 1st and 3rd paragraphs of the first appeal template, there a ref's to popla 2012 which form part of the formal challenge. I gather Ukcps will not go the popla route being in the IPC, so can I leave them in or dosent it really matter.


    ps got some good pics today of people carriers tall enough to hide signeage
  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I doubt it says popla 2012 , more like POFA 2012
  • barold
    barold Posts: 31 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    Redx wrote: »
    I doubt it says popla 2012 , more like POFA 2012




    Getting too confident you see.


    thanks for pointing that out. SHOULD READ...... POFA
  • barold
    barold Posts: 31 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    Umkomaas wrote: »
    Thanks for clarifying that. Just send off the initial appeal from the sticky now.



    Hello again. Have just received a response to my 1st stage appeal. It was not the rejection I expected.


    They wrote saying, (edited relevant bits) "if you are the registered keeper, we now have the right to recover from the keeper that unpaid amount".


    And "You as the keeper have had the right to appeal within 28 day from point of issue of ntk. please note the 28 days has elapsed.


    it looks to me as if they are saying they havnt received the 1st appeal.


    I would appreciate your thoughts (again).


    thank you
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.