We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Bank Charges Test Case Article discussion
Comments
-
sorry dont agree ,i dont wear rose tinted glasses,anything close to any government is suspect in my view ,and i couldnt care one toss what anyone says about my posts,i believe your post to be crass,next........
Oh - so your beliefs are to be trusted more than factual evidence?:rolleyes:
Funny, that's exactly how Blair went into the Iraq war.0 -
PhiltheBear wrote: »Oh - so your beliefs are to be trusted more than factual evidence?
.
Or to put it another way, it's the lack of factual evidence - the entire basis for conspiracy theories - which make them just that - vacuous theories.0 -
PhiltheBear wrote: »Oh - so your beliefs are to be trusted more than factual evidence?:rolleyes:
Funny, that's exactly how Blair went into the Iraq war.
give me your factual evidence that no wrong doing was undertaken with this case.............missed direct debit charges,very odd,theres no pain so how come the big gain,i.e £39.00 for a letter0 -
give me your factual evidence that no wrong doing was undertaken with this case.............
The Litigation Agreement, Judgments, test case hearing transcripts & case management hearing transcripts are all evidence that the test case was conducted properly and the result was based entirely on the application of the law.
No doubt you'll respond with ''that's a load of Bo***ks'' but offer no evidence in return.
Right?0 -
Alpine_Star wrote: »The Litigation Agreement, Judgments, test case hearing transcripts & case management hearing transcripts are all evidence that the test case was conducted properly and the result was based entirely on the application of the law.
No doubt you'll respond with ''that's a load of Bo***ks'' but offer no evidence in return.
Right?
what i will say in response is this,government, banks and the supreme court etc and there ilk,are amongst the most sly,underhand ,deceiptfull,lying,group of people on the planet,they are hard nosed relentless people,THAT IS THE NATURE OF THERE JOBS,IF THEY WERENT LIKE THAT, THE COUNTRY WOULD BE IN A BIGGER MESS THAN IT IS,ASK ANY MEMEBER OF THESE ORGANISATIONS A SIMPLE QUESTION AND HE OR SHE WILL GIVE YOU AN ANSWER THAT CATERS TO THERE POSITION,NOT THE TRUE ANSWER.this bank charge case was WAR,do you think or believe they are going to conduct it in a civil and honest manner ?,remember all is fair in love and war,that means anything goes,lies deciept coruption etc etc etc,as long as they get the result they need.next question please....................missed direct debit charges,very odd,theres no pain so how come the big gain,i.e £39.00 for a letter0 -
hi everyone basically wanting sum advice ive lost my job in december i have £2000 worth of charges i wanna get back from lloyds tsb and another figure from natwest.Wats the chances of me getting some back im on job seekers allowance and help would be much appreciated0
-
hi everyone basically wanting sum advice ive lost my job in december i have £2000 worth of charges i wanna get back from lloyds tsb and another figure from natwest.Wats the chances of me getting some back im on job seekers allowance and help would be much appreciated
have you got any priority debt arrears like rent ,water rates,council tax etc,if so then your bank should deal with a refund based on this,otherwise you may struggle with the the rules at present getting any cash.missed direct debit charges,very odd,theres no pain so how come the big gain,i.e £39.00 for a letter0 -
what i will say in response is this,government, banks and the supreme court etc and there ilk,are amongst the most sly,underhand ,deceiptfull,lying,group of people on the planet,they are hard nosed relentless people,THAT IS THE NATURE OF THERE JOBS,IF THEY WERENT LIKE THAT, THE COUNTRY WOULD BE IN A BIGGER MESS THAN IT IS,ASK ANY MEMEBER OF THESE ORGANISATIONS A SIMPLE QUESTION AND HE OR SHE WILL GIVE YOU AN ANSWER THAT CATERS TO THERE POSITION,NOT THE TRUE ANSWER.this bank charge case was WAR,do you think or believe they are going to conduct it in a civil and honest manner ?,remember all is fair in love and war,that means anything goes,lies deciept coruption etc etc etc,as long as they get the result they need.next question please....................
Chris, I have been saying to you this for the last few months. Read the stuff we are talking about. At the moment, the impression I get from you is that you are a paranoid angry man who would torch his local branch, rather than a determined positive campaigner looking for the solutions contained within the judgements and even the OFT opinion last month. You are helping posters on here(which just abouts means I don't think you have completely lost all sense of reality), but if you researched in whichever way you feel you can for legal arguments then it would be appreciated more than the current ramblings which is like Christmas TV 2009.....not much on and very disappointing
0 -
natweststaffmember wrote: »Chris, I have been saying to you this for the last few months. Read the stuff we are talking about. At the moment, the impression I get from you is that you are a paranoid angry man who would torch his local branch, rather than a determined positive campaigner looking for the solutions contained within the judgements and even the OFT opinion last month. You are helping posters on here(which just abouts means I don't think you have completely lost all sense of reality), but if you researched in whichever way you feel you can for legal arguments then it would be appreciated more than the current ramblings which is like Christmas TV 2009.....not much on and very disappointing
i would never torch anything thats far too strong,id cover the branch in horse poo though,im not one for aggresive tactics even though some of my posts seem aggresive,the stance that has been given to myself from the halifax however has been very aggresive to the extent of implied threats from there main spokesman,i will try to curb my thoughts on there obvious behavior as it seems to be a negative one for the site,my apologiesmissed direct debit charges,very odd,theres no pain so how come the big gain,i.e £39.00 for a letter0 -
:mad::mad::mad: I can understand your frustration Chris, as soon as I saw the word halifax it was understandable
Hubby has just been walloped by £975 in charges this morning (following THEIR intrepretation of what 3 working days means .... 4 not actually 3) and been told to go forth and multiply by his prsonal business manager.
Surely this is all wrong wrong wrong!
Our whole house of cards is falling down around us (literally too I might add), but hey, the shareholders will still get their Krug at the AGM
How long can this robbery go on?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards