We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Toyota Yaris Daytime Lights

1235»

Comments

  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    For brake lights - the most common longer-term use of multi-element, including LED, lights - the MOT standard is that a fail requires less than 50% of the light elements to be working.

    http://www.motinfo.gov.uk/htdocs/m4s01000201.htm
  • Joe_Horner
    Joe_Horner Posts: 4,895 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    AdrianC wrote: »
    For brake lights - the most common longer-term use of multi-element, including LED, lights - the MOT standard is that a fail requires less than 50% of the light elements to be working.

    http://www.motinfo.gov.uk/htdocs/m4s01000201.htm


    Same applies to position (side and tail) lights.
  • almillar
    almillar Posts: 8,621 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    They probably didn't realise their lights weren't on, because on a lot of modern cars the dashboard illuminates when the ignition is turned on.
    Yep, either this, or they think they have sufficient lighting from their DRLs. But their rear is not!
  • Retrogamer
    Retrogamer Posts: 4,218 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    On most cars as well, when the DRL and sidelights use the same leds, when you switch the sidelights on the DRLs dim about 50% as well as the rear lights coming on to reduce glare.
    All your base are belong to us.
  • headpin
    headpin Posts: 780 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts
    Hedgehog99 wrote: »
    It isn't the law in the UK to use DRLs, it's a silly trend unless you drive a Volvo, and, IMHO, they:

    1) Waste energy/bulbs (OK, I know some new ones are LEDs)

    2) Dazzle oncoming road users unnecessarily

    3) Affect migraine sufferers

    4) Condition road users to look for lights, not objects, adding to dangers for pedestrians & cyclists.

    Long live a bit of common sense and the understanding of when it is appropriate to use side- and headlights (and fog lights for that matter).
    It is not the law to use daylight running lights in the UK. But, it is the law that all cars in the EU that received type approval (the required standard to be used on an EU road) after July 2011 must have DLR LIGHTS. Cars receiving type approval prior to this date can have DLR LIGHTS but they are not mandatory and therefore the manufacturer could provide an option to deactivate. However, since July 2011 cars achieving type approval will not have this option and by deactivating the DLR LIGHTS you will certainly invalidate your insurance unless they approve, in advance, of your actions.

    Do not get the date a car receives type approval mixed up with the registration date, model launch, etc. And, a new type approval is often needed for face lifts as well as complete new models.
  • Joe_Horner
    Joe_Horner Posts: 4,895 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    headpin wrote: »
    It is not the law to use daylight running lights in the UK. But, it is the law that all cars in the EU that received type approval (the required standard to be used on an EU road) after July 2011 must have DLR LIGHTS. Cars receiving type approval prior to this date can have DLR LIGHTS but they are not mandatory and therefore the manufacturer could provide an option to deactivate. However, since July 2011 cars achieving type approval will not have this option and by deactivating the DLR LIGHTS you will certainly invalidate your insurance unless they approve, in advance, of your actions.

    Do not get the date a car receives type approval mixed up with the registration date, model launch, etc. And, a new type approval is often needed for face lifts as well as complete new models.

    Excellent post apart from the bit in bold. You may (or may not, depending on the circumstances) invalidate any own -car cover by disabling them, but you certainly won't completely invalidate your insurance.

    It's impossible to completely invalidate insurance on the basis of anything to do with the car's condition (amongst other reasons) thanks to the RTA requirements regarding compliant policies.

    An insurer who attempts to do so is acting unlawfully and could, potentially, be liable for criminal proceedings seeing as all policies must[/] be certified to comply with the RTA requirements - check your certificate, somewhere on it there will be a statement to that effect notionally signed on behalf of the insurer.

    And that's a good thing because, in the event of an accident, it protects a completely innocent party from having an at-fault driver's insurer refusing payout for spurious reasons.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.