We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Premium Bonds Article Discussion Area
Comments
-
Checked on the prize checker site and it states no wins this month, also checked bond account and no change in balance, when it states no wins on the prize checker site does that mean just for the smaller prizes or is that all prizes inc the bigger ones? Only ask as someone on here did state on here somewhere that they received confirmation of a large win a few days after the draw date0
-
shanew4874 said:Checked on the prize checker site and it states no wins this month, also checked bond account and no change in balance, when it states no wins on the prize checker site does that mean just for the smaller prizes or is that all prizes inc the bigger ones?shanew4874 said:Only ask as someone on here did state on here somewhere that they received confirmation of a large win a few days after the draw date2
-
eskbanker said:shanew4874 said:Checked on the prize checker site and it states no wins this month, also checked bond account and no change in balance, when it states no wins on the prize checker site does that mean just for the smaller prizes or is that all prizes inc the bigger ones?shanew4874 said:Only ask as someone on here did state on here somewhere that they received confirmation of a large win a few days after the draw date0
-
ML seems to have a problem with PBs. If you are putting in a small amount or are not a higher rate taxpayer then totally agree you should avoid them. However, if you are a higher rate taxpayer with a lump sum invested, returns on PBs invariably beat bank deposits (certainly variable rate deposits, often also beating 1yr FRBs), due to the returns being tax-free.
ML over complicates the analysis. 80% of the prize-fund is paid out in lower prizes (25,50,100), if you have 50k invested logically you ARE going to get 'average luck' over time, you ARE going to see an average of 80% of the prize fund as a return over time.
So right now 80% of 4.4% = 3.52% net. For a 40% taxpayer, that is the same as getting 5.86% on a bank deposit (vs ~5.2% being the best 1yr FRB currently).
I have held PBs for ~15yrs and have tracked the returns. On a 250k holding (i.e. across a family of 5) I have never failed, in any year, to get less than 80% of the average prize fund as a return. You might well not achieve this year-on-year record with 50k invested, but over a longer time period, say 5yrs, I would expect you would also hit the average 80% of the %age prize-fund as a return.0 -
10ants said:ML seems to have a problem with PBs. If you are putting in a small amount or are not a higher rate taxpayer then totally agree you should avoid them. However, if you are a higher rate taxpayer with a lump sum invested, returns on PBs invariably beat bank deposits (certainly variable rate deposits, often also beating 1yr FRBs), due to the returns being tax-free.So overall, the higher tax band you're in, and the more money you're saving in Premium Bonds, the better a bet they look for you.0
-
The £50k limit on individual Premium Bond holdings was set in 2015, with purchaing power equivalent to £75k today.I asked my MP whether there are any plans to restore the value of the maximum holding or index it. The reply from the Treasury was negative. One reason given is that "raising the limit can lead to the scheme becoming dominated by a small number of people with large investments. NS&I has found from experience that customers are sensitive to taking part in a prixe draw in which some people hold a very large number of bonds.".Interestingly the reply goes on to state that "NS&I is sensitive to changing the investment limit in a way that disadvantages other banks and firms that offer rates of interest with similar returns to Premium Bonds." It seems that, by design, Premium Bonds will not compete with other banks.0
-
MikemseForum said:Interestingly the reply goes on to state that "NS&I is sensitive to changing the investment limit in a way that disadvantages other banks and firms that offer rates of interest with similar returns to Premium Bonds." It seems that, by design, Premium Bonds will not compete with other banks.0
-
MikemseForum said:The £50k limit on individual Premium Bond holdings was set in 2015, with purchaing power equivalent to £75k today.
2 -
Premium Bond Prize funds reducing from 4.8% to 4.6% in August...........~ NSD 2025 - NSD August 16/20 (7 x💯)# Spectos/Royal Mail Monitoring and Posting Panel - Ongoing - 1 x £25 Voucher Redeemed, 20 FREE Books of RM Stamps & Presentation Packs.~ Totally FREE Christmas 2025 - 🎁✉️🏷🎀💐🪪🗒🧺⭐️Completed Challenges 2025:# No.36 Make £2025 in 2025 £212.50 / £2025 (4) 💯💯💯# No.12 Save £2 a Day 2025 2025: £730/ £730 💯# No.27 Save 1p A Day 2025 £667.95 / £667.95 💯# No.19 52 Week Env Challenge £1378 / £1378 💯# No.34 Save £12k in 2025 £16,543.30 / £12,000 💯 (8) - Continuing0
-
Dizzycap said:Premium Bond Prize funds reducing from 4.8% to 4.6% in August...........4
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards