We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

8 month old faulty TV and Currys?

13»

Comments

  • gik
    gik Posts: 1,130 Forumite
    adpod wrote: »
    No I said the manufacturer replaced the screen/frame and that 'new' frame had the same damage.

    Samsung said its a new part and shouldnt be damaged so they dont want to do anything further.

    Sale of Goods Act means I take it up withthe retailer not the manufacturer.



    That's the problem, you didn't initially. You went directly to the manufacturer without involving the retailer.
  • Fosterdog
    Fosterdog Posts: 4,948 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If the frame had the same damage then could it actually be the same frame? Usually if a screen is replaced the frame doesn't need to be unless it got damaged while taking the old screen out.

    They may have fixed an actual screen fault but not seen a damaged frame as being a manufacturing fault
  • adpod
    adpod Posts: 242 Forumite
    gik wrote: »
    That's the problem, you didn't initially. You went directly to the manufacturer without involving the retailer.

    Well seeing as its less than 12 months old I went to the manufacturer because its still under their warranty - they failed to fix the fault so what are my options now?
  • adpod
    adpod Posts: 242 Forumite
    Fosterdog wrote: »
    If the frame had the same damage then could it actually be the same frame? Usually if a screen is replaced the frame doesn't need to be unless it got damaged while taking the old screen out.

    They may have fixed an actual screen fault but not seen a damaged frame as being a manufacturing fault

    They told me the screen and frame is one solid unit - its definately a different frame as the damage is in different places
  • SuperHan
    SuperHan Posts: 2,269 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Wait a minute, this is all about damage?!

    If the television is damaged, then neither the retailer, nor Samsung are likely to do much about it, as damage isn't covered by either the SoGA or any manufacturers warranty that I know of.

    I assumed we were talking about a fault, and then it came back damaged.

    You've made the SoGA path more difficult now though, as someone has since tampered with the TV (Samsung) without the retailer getting involved.
  • adpod
    adpod Posts: 242 Forumite
    SuperHan wrote: »
    Wait a minute, this is all about damage?!

    If the television is damaged, then neither the retailer, nor Samsung are likely to do much about it, as damage isn't covered by either the SoGA or any manufacturers warranty that I know of.

    I assumed we were talking about a fault, and then it came back damaged.

    You've made the SoGA path more difficult now though, as someone has since tampered with the TV (Samsung) without the retailer getting involved.

    The first repair was due to damage caused during the manufacturing process when that was being repair the same damage occurred (manufacturer process fault) and it was returnded to me still damaged.

    I went to the manufacture as it was less than 12 months and still under their warranty.

    Funnily enough when I called Currys to explain the situation, before I said anything they said I needed to contact the manufacturer as less than 12 months old - so the retailer tried to pass the buck before hearing that I already went to Samsung for a repair.
  • adpod
    adpod Posts: 242 Forumite
    SuperHan wrote: »
    Wait a minute, this is all about damage?!

    If the television is damaged, then neither the retailer, nor Samsung are likely to do much about it, as damage isn't covered by either the SoGA or any manufacturers warranty that I know of.

    I assumed we were talking about a fault, and then it came back damaged.

    You've made the SoGA path more difficult now though, as someone has since tampered with the TV (Samsung) without the retailer getting involved.

    The first repair was due to damage caused during the manufacturing process when that was being repaired the same damage occurred (manufacturer process fault) and it was returned to me still damaged.

    I went to the manufacture as it was less than 12 months and still under their warranty.

    Funnily enough when I called Currys to explain the situation, before I said anything they said I needed to contact the manufacturer as less than 12 months old - so the retailer tried to pass the buck before hearing that I already went to Samsung for a repair.
  • Fosterdog
    Fosterdog Posts: 4,948 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If the TV was damaged during manufacture why did it take 8 months to get sorted? Surely you would have returned it as soon as it was opened.

    It is really difficult to understand what type of damage you could possibly be talking about for it to be left this long, have you maybe got pictures to help us all understand what has actually happened to the TV?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.