UKCPS ticket from 2012

Coupon-mad

Well I would reply as per zzzLazyDaisy's robust response example in the LBCCC fightback thread already linked for you. The response needs to come from the registered keeper NOT saying who was driving.

However he could add (to Daisy's example template) that he was not driving on that occasion and so UKCPS would have needed to comply with Schedule 4 of the POFA 2012 in order to pursue this charge against him. As it is in the public domain that UKCPS were not using compliant Notice to Driver and Notice to Keeper letters at the end of 2012 then there is no cause of action against the keeper and any continued contact is harassment. This letter is a warning to cease and desist this harassment of a registered keeper who cannot be held liable, and this latest desperate trawling through old cases to try to extort money from keepers when the 'second condition' for keeper liability, as defined in the Schedule, has not been met, smacks of desperation by UKCPS. Any further correspondence except to cancel the PCN will be forwarded to the BPA and DVLA as evidence for a formal complaint for serious breach of the BPA Code of Practice regarding misleading correspondence with motorists. An Operator, or their agent, cannot pursue a registered keeper where the requirements of Schedule 4 were not met, and that would include any UKCPS ticket issued in 2012 and 2013 (and arguably, 2014).

ampersand

toft - you still haven't amended post 1, as prosnap advised.

'We left a cinema during a power cut and found a fake parking invoice ' is enough.

ditto #4 and c-m's quote from same, which implies by omission.

#10
delete: 'So should I tell then I he wasn't driving?'

Quentin

ampersand wrote: »

#10
delete: 'So should I tell then I he wasn't driving?'

Not #10 - it's #7

ampersand

Thankyou Q - mis-typed quoted date for post#

Toooldforthis

Amended again I think !!

There was no ticket I put it turns out the car was parked wrong as we got the letter on Saturday and that was the first we knew

I can't amend when people have quoted can I ???

ampersand

No, but don't worry about that now.
toft - you've still left #1 unamended. Do that first, as shown in #13. Hit edit, in your #1, then paste the new sentence over your old one.

-then, can you punctuate 2nd sentence please? Is it this?
There was no ticket.
? I put? - means?
It turns out the car was parked wrong as we got the letter on Saturday and that was the first we knew.

Does this mean this new letter, received last Sat., describes the alleged parking event?
Does it refer to any p/w nos. suggesting that an NTK was issued but unseen by you at the time?

That's enough for the moment. Baby due crimbo-ish? Take care.

Quentin

Toooldforthis wrote: »

Amended again I think !!

Still not edited #4 either

Toooldforthis

I have edited stuff again. I was only trying to give information as it may have been relevant :-(

To cllarity the first we knew was Saturday but I remember the date and why

Toooldforthis

It gives a ticket number and various costs
There wasn't a ticket on the car when we returned

Coupon-mad

Toooldforthis wrote: »

It gives a ticket number and various costs
There wasn't a ticket on the car when we returned

What gives a ticket number? The Notice to Keeper (NTK) that UKPCS sent 2 years ago, have you still got that (the first letter)? Please show the NTK, both sides, if you have it.