some help pcn challenge

Coupon-mad

we received a threatening letter stating that they were going to refer it to morgan knightly, however they are a firm apparently

I am sure they are 'a firm' - but connected to SIP, a fact which is not disclosed. Even if you get small claim papers this one would be very defendable you know. We helped people see off SIP in at least 4 cases I can recall last year where they issued Court papers, they clocked the forum strong defence, then ran away with their tail between their legs!

eddy1

many thanks coupon mad
I see they have now corrected the spelling on knightley on their website, very professional now it looks, but yes no disclosure about ownership, which basically the same people


are those threads that you assisted still on the forums, just so I can view,


eddy

Coupon-mad

Yes you will find them by searching 'SIP Court' as keywords, I would suggest. Also I seem to recall that the omissions in the NTK were exposed in detail in at least one thread (I know these SIP letters are not compliant and a cursory glance at that front page you posted doesn't lead me to believe it's changed much, so I would suggest it's not capable of passing as a POFA 2012 compliant NTK). But it's late, you haven't shown the back, and I must get to bed! And in any case you should find the flaws written out already on last year's SIP Court threads where we saw them off and the defence points were shown in at least one post.

eddy1

thanks coupon mad


I will post a link of the rest of the NTK to receive advice on compliance or not


eddy1


http://s1049.photobucket.com/user/jcardo1/library/?sort=3&page=1

Coupon-mad

You just need to compare it with paragraph 8 of schedule 4 which is in simple bullet points, easy to read & compare. Linked in the Newbies thread.

eddy1

will do


thanks

eddy1

hi all received some information today that this ppc
applied for NTK because first challenge by driver did not specifically state that they were the driver, hence the application for NTK


is this a reasonable cause, even though the first driver sent the pcn back to them, and they wrote back for parking ticket


eddy

Coupon-mad

Yes they could get the keeper's data if it wasn't clear who the driver was, such as if they got an appeal from a person who didn't specifically say so. Was the NTK received (not 'sent') received, by day 57 counting from the parking event date?

eddy1

hi coupon mad


yes it was received by day 57


offence 12/6


date of ntk 25/7


will review further aspects of ntk for compliance


eddy

eddy1

apologies


received several days later than 25/7


eddy