Statement of account regualtions & law

powerful_Rogue

sufferin_scotnet_customer wrote: »

It's not a place i am going to waist time visiting again.

It's been emotional. We've had our ups and downs, but it was a joy while it lasted.

A very Merry Christmas to you.

wealdroam

sufferin_scotnet_customer wrote: »

It's not a place i am going to waist time visiting again.

And watch that waste line over Christmas.

sufferin_scotnet_customer

I see A place were the regulars treat honest questions with contempt & bully peopl off of it, must be full of lawyers!

I commend the moderators for such a nasty forum.

Blackbeard_of_Perranporth

sufferin_scotnet_customer wrote: »

I see A place were the regulars treat honest questions with contempt & bully peopl off of it, must be full of lawyers!

I commend the moderators for such a nasty forum.

Oh dear. If the regulars knew what the question is, they may be able to offer an answer.

Alas,as I interrupted earlier, without a question to answer, all we can do on a public forum is to speculate what the question is, and offer advice such as a barrack room lawyer.

This advice is given free, much the same as can be gotten in the Bell and Clanger, except, mostly unlike the Bell and Clanger, most here are not heading For more wobbleades.

I trust that OP still has not got the answer they are looking for. In this case, I suggest that the figure of £300 for professional retained advice would be more fitting.

Hintza

I was going to suggest we might need the popcorn but I suspect I'm too late.

This thread had a certain amount of promise!

halibut2209

We've certainly had a couple of crackers in the last few days. Answers correctly given, obvious sarcasm taken as fact, accusations of working for certain companies. This has everything!

All it needs now is "I've solved the problem and scotnet have given me £3000 to say sorry"

Blackbeard_of_Perranporth

sufferin_scotnet_customer wrote: »

NO we have already heard from one scam artist with unsubstantiated qualifications wanting £300 odd for an hours work! Clearly doesn't need the money so why they frequent a website about saving money who knows, maybe its to fleece the poor & vulnerable. I'm not the latter!

The forum claims to be a consumer champion not a place for leeches to exploit vulnerable people. As i consider all lawyers in the same category as politicians, bankers etc.

So if you are a lawyer i am glad to shut down any dialogue with you at all right now!BILL yourself!

Thank you for a sensible & positive response. and this is why i felt it necessary to respond to others that offered advice that simply strayed from the subject line. NO My question did not regard a bill or charge from an ISP at all, was nothing to do with tariffs or me challenging a legal charge ! which everyone has been mislead into thinking! Because a few earlier posters gave answers that did not apply to the question

it was technical question regarding act of parliament which has nothing to do with the service that the ISP provided but their legal obligations to the communication's act 2003, section 54.2(c) & section 52.3(b). You dont need to be a lawyer to have knowledge of the law, most acts are now published on ugov.

This is why i wish people did not speculate or offer opinion because it has simply taken the thread out of context.

I posted to this forum to save money on parasitic lawyers & time trawling through needless comments & opinions on websites that can not substantiate their comments with fact or reference their assertions with documented proof.

I got the response i would expect from parasitic lawyers who exploit people in a time of need & if this offend the aforementioned so be it. Would appear there only interest is making money not saving money.

That said i have had enough and clearly this website is a waste of time & as i am sure the many on here who don't like people sticking up for them selves! It's not a place i am going to waist time visiting again.

From this, I gather some website requested that OP had to give them their email address. And since this time they have fe je ed dubious solicited offers of get me rich scheme, drug outlets and pictures of the wife
There for my considered opinion is OP should use a spam filter to prevent further losses.