We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Advise Please Legal Action Over Trade-in
Options
Comments
-
When they asked about the vehicle, did you claim that it had done 80K, even though you had 2 MOTS that have higher mileages on?
That is likely misrepresentation.
If the MOTs have mileages consistent with the 80k then I would say you have nothing to worry about as you simply say
To the best of my knowledge the mileage is accurate, as supported by the MOTs which are consistent eg 48k, 55k, 62k,71k, 79k
You cn't be held responsible for something that happened 5 years before you bought it, but if the mileages on the MOT show the true mileage
eg 88k, 102k, 62k,71k, 79k then you might be on a sticky wicket.I want to go back to The Olden Days, when every single thing that I can think of was better.....
(except air quality and Medical Science)
0 -
You would just describe it as having a mileage discrepancy and it is believe to be around 120K miles.
No big issue really.
It may not be a major issue but I am sure it would lower the price below that of a car with a genuine 120k on the clock. If nothing else because people like me would be concerned of buying it and so less competition = lower price.
What percentage the price should drop by I dont have a scoobies of though.0 -
there is the possibility that it is not clocked, but a typo went uncorrected, eg the mileage should have been
45 59 63 71 76 and it was recorded as 45 95 63 71 76
You cannot appeal a typo in the mileage for a previous MOT. This would need supporting evidence eg. service book and likely stillwouldn't be believed.
Usual reason to clock a car is to lose starship mileage per year, eg taxi use of 40k between MOTs becomes 10k, rather like a previous work colleague who only connected his speedo cable for 2 weeks before & after his MOT, you will not spot this with any online checking, and as the last 5 mileages are on the MOT now, losing miles between tests is too obvious to the buyer.I want to go back to The Olden Days, when every single thing that I can think of was better.....
(except air quality and Medical Science)
0 -
When they asked about the vehicle, did you claim that it had done 80K, even though you had 2 MOTS that have higher mileages on?
That is likely misrepresentation.
If the MOTs have mileages consistent with the 80k then I would say you have nothing to worry about as you simply say
To the best of my knowledge the mileage is accurate, as supported by the MOTs which are consistent eg 48k, 55k, 62k,71k, 79k
You cn't be held responsible for something that happened 5 years before you bought it, but if the mileages on the MOT show the true mileage
eg 88k, 102k, 62k,71k, 79k then you might be on a sticky wicket.
I (we) never checked the mot's (I will do from now on) but after Kia told my mum they know she(we) haven't clocked it they must show the lower mileage before my first mot. I don't have any of the old mots.0 -
So they've admitted you didn't do it?
Tell em to FRO0 -
Nodding_Donkey wrote: »So they've admitted you didn't do it?
Tell em to FRO
my mum told them on the phone we didn't know and we didn't do it and the guy replied we know you haven't done it, But the letter says we have clocked it or known it was clocked!0 -
Have you actually read the contract of sale? What does it state about the exchange vehicle not being what you said it was?0
-
InsideInsurance wrote: »Have you actually read the contract of sale? What does it state about the exchange vehicle not being what you said it was?
I've asked my mum about it and she cannot find it (but has it somewhere)0 -
Sounds like your Mum is a sweet old lady and the clown who slavered over selling a car to a willing underwriter did no basic checks and is caught looking for someone to blame.
As has been stated, the trader is the professional here, they have to carry out credible, recorded checks on anything they sell.
Make sure your friend of a friend isn't the driveway dealer, clocking scum here and then tell the trader to FO.0 -
Sounds like your Mum is a sweet old lady and the clown who slavered over selling a car to a willing underwriter did no basic checks and is caught looking for someone to blame.
As has been stated, the trader is the professional here, they have to carry out credible, recorded checks on anything they sell.
Make sure your friend of a friend isn't the driveway dealer, clocking scum here and then tell the trader to FO.
Yeah my mum is 64, I've never been able to get hold of the so called 'friend of a friend'0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards