Entitlement to a refund on clothing.

rustyboy21

This has got to be a wind up.

wealdroam

rustyboy21 wrote: »

This has got to be a wind up.

I don't think so.

I'm pretty sure photome has asked a genuine question.

OlliesDad

unholyangel wrote: »

Yeah I noticed that.

Not sure how to phrase this without trying to sound rude but here goes....I'm not sure how thats relevant to what I posted? Durable medium is a requirement EU wide. It was actually an ECJ that defined durable medium (that it is to serve the same function as paper, that emails are durable but links sent within an email are not along with that the information was to be received with no positive action on the consumers part).

Unless I've wrongly interpreted your post anyway, was the only thing I could think you were getting at!

Haha, apologies, I quoted you rather than just a straight forward reply. It was more a FYI post.

photome

wealdroam wrote: »

I don't think so.

I'm pretty sure photome has asked a genuine question.

Yep, genuine question.

Looking at that shoe in the pic it looks like a "normal" shoe to me so why is it called a low top.

I have just bought a skate board so want to know what type to buy, I have the crash helmet, knee pads, elbow pads,so am all set to go;)

unholyangel

photome wrote: »

Can someone tell me what a low top shoe is as opposed to a "normal" shoe.

god i feel old

I always thought low top and hi top were US terms, at least I cant remember seeing those terms used as a child until i was in the US. Hi/high tops cover the ankle where low tops are just the foot.

OlliesDad wrote: »

Haha, apologies, I quoted you rather than just a straight forward reply. It was more a FYI post.

Thank god for that! Thought I was going senile and missing something lol

photome

unholyangel wrote: »

I always thought low top and hi top were US terms, at least I cant remember seeing those terms used as a child until i was in the US. Hi/high tops cover the ankle where low tops are just the foot.




Thank god for that! Thought I was going senile and missing something lol

If thats the case then the shoe in the pic is quite obviously a low top IMO

gik

SwiiftYz wrote: »

Considering the above image shows that I can't see it and the fact I was linked from another website while NOT searching for low tops.. not my fault at all.

I can see the image you've posted fairly clearly.