📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Police to sieze mobile phones after a RTC

123457»

Comments

  • TadleyBaggie
    TadleyBaggie Posts: 6,658 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Nothing new. I had a RTA a few years ago, both of my mobile phones were removed from me.
  • boliston
    boliston Posts: 3,012 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    I'm pretty sure most mobiles can be remotely "wiped". Presumably the "wipe" would take effect from when the phone is next switched on after being confiscated or stolen. Not sure if removing the sim before switching on would prevent a wipe though - perhaps the forensics would remove the flash memory from the device and extract the data directly rather than via the phone.
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    boliston wrote: »
    I'm pretty sure most mobiles can be remotely "wiped". Presumably the "wipe" would take effect from when the phone is next switched on after being confiscated or stolen. Not sure if removing the sim before switching on would prevent a wipe though - perhaps the forensics would remove the flash memory from the device and extract the data directly rather than via the phone.

    come on. remote wipe is merely a bit more work to recover the data.
  • boliston
    boliston Posts: 3,012 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    custardy wrote: »
    come on. remote wipe is merely a bit more work to recover the data.
    Never used it so would not have a clue if it's a simple "delete" or if it "overwrites" with random 0's & 1's like some "wipe" apps for PC
  • arcon5
    arcon5 Posts: 14,099 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    As said, remote wipe is useless as they can get records from the carriers themselves. Just makes their job a bit easier and quicker if the evidence* is on the phone.

    *evidence being used loosely since simply having a record of a phone call in progress isn't evidence of wrongdoing.
  • topdaddy_2
    topdaddy_2 Posts: 1,408 Forumite
    So are police searching crash "suspects/victims"?
  • OnanTheBarbarian
    OnanTheBarbarian Posts: 1,500 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    edited 28 July 2014 at 11:08AM
    It is all being quoted out of context and the facts can be found more here

    http://www.acpo.presscentre.com/Press-Releases/Reports-of-police-seizing-mobile-phones-after-every-road-traffic-collision-are-inaccurate-2e8.aspx

    "It has been standard practice to seize mobile phones from drivers at the scenes of very serious collisions for some time as part of the information and evidence gathering process, but it is not now, nor will it be, standard practice to seize phones from drivers after every collision.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.