We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Halifax May +3.9% MOM, +8.7% YOY
Comments
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »I did say that.
But I also said people were moving out and selling their homes with "foreign investors moving in".
As in "moving in" and buying it up as an investment, not physcially immigrating to the Uk and moving their family in.
Fair enough. I assume the numbers are insignificant either way?0 -
Someone is going to have to draw another crayon diagram in a minute.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
-
Gotta be honest mate, I don't get this bit.
If houses are too expensive to live in, either via renting or owning, then they will stay empty and the price will fall.
Not if there is a panic to buy, and people overstretch themselves or buy in the expectation of getting high returns from increasing prices.
Prices would be going up because of a shortage of supply, but they are going up far faster than that because of fear and invesment - both of which are much more susceptible to a crash if it looks like prices won't keep on rising.0 -
Wonder what would happen if Carney just made an announcement that he would do whatever it takes to stop house prices rising any further?0
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »I didn't say all.
I said newly built properties are being bought by investors. Which they are. If I had meant all, I would have said "all new houses".
I also didn't say building wasn't essential. I simply said it doesn't solve the issue on it's own.
clearly building sufficient new houses will solve a housing problem.0 -
Wonder what would happen if Carney just made an announcement that he would do whatever it takes to stop house prices rising any further?
He's already said it's the biggest threat to the recovery so people will judge him by actions (e.g. what the FPC do or not do when they meet later this month) and the impact that has rather than further rhetoric.0 -
The solution remains simple. Build more houses.
I fully understand this argument, but who's going to build them and then sell them for anything less than the absolute maximum achievable?
If you can't realise your maximum profit then you will just restrict the supply and build slightly less until you do.
It's like trying for force Ferrari to build more cars so we can all afford a cheap one. They will just say 'nope', end of story.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
