Why is Money Expert recommending insecure sites?

InsideInsurance

Doshwaster wrote: »

Maybe Amazon should - it would reduce those impulse one click purchases made after a few glasses of wine.

Exactly, whats in it for them?

3D secure is currently still optional and arguably to the detriment of the consumer as its shifts the burden of proof (at least from a practical view point if not a legal one)

Lioness_Twinkletoes

TeresaKew wrote: »

I have just purchased TomTatos from Thompson & Morgan from your site and only discovered afterwards that their site was not "verified by Visa". Surely this doesn't make sense?

What's a TomTato?

Aquamania

Lioness_Twinkletoes wrote: »

What's a TomTato?

Google is your friend

... even if you don't read MSE



:cool:

InsideInsurance

adindas wrote: »

Keep in mind verified is a service offer by Visa to vendor and the vendor need to pay for this.

Wrong way round, vendors have to pay to not have it (beyond the cost of changing their sites to support it)

gik

Ordering anything from T&M was your first mistake. Two years ago I ordered plants. Half of them arrived in a state of dying. Last year they arrived a full six weeks late from the time I was quoted. No replies to complaint emails either time. Stay away and buy local.

Lioness_Twinkletoes

Aquamania wrote: »

Google is your friend

I don't need Google - I've got you

Quasar

MoneyExpert and moneysavingexpert sites look COMPLETELY different. When coming in to post, didn't this difference ring a bell at all? Just asking.