ParkingEye set aside judgement HELP Had problems in court today. Please help.

The_Deep

Oops, clearly the OP has not read the stickies or the rules, please read the stickies and then start your own thread.


On reading back, I see that the original poster was given some very poor advice, especially from Bazster, who has been criticized several times on here and other fora for this sort of thing, be warned, Bazster is a know all who does not know as much as he thinks he does.

Umkomaas

The_Deep wrote: »

Oops, clearly the OP has not read the stickies or the rules, please read the stickies and then start your own thread.


On reading back, I see that the original poster was given some very poor advice, especially from Bazster, who has been criticized several times on here and other fora for this sort of thing, be warned, Bazster is a know all who does not know as much as he thinks he does.

Harsh TD, very harsh.

I've re-read the thread and I can find no input by Bazster to the OP in any way, other than one tongue-in-cheek comment after the case was all settled, and one link which was confirming that a set aside fee is £155. Care to quote other inputs from him on this case?

The_Deep

Not so harsh, he has considerable form. Read this and follow the links, he is a serial offender.

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4198909=

peter_the_piper

Kel35 wrote: »

Hi I have a similar situation and received the same e mail today so does this mean I still have to go to court to get ccj set aside or is it settled ?

By tagging onto the end of an old thread there is a chance that your question will not be found. Could you please start a new thread, giving all the details of your problem.

bazster

The_Deep wrote: »

Oops, clearly the OP has not read the stickies or the rules, please read the stickies and then start your own thread.


On reading back, I see that the original poster was given some very poor advice, especially from Bazster, who has been criticized several times on here and other fora for this sort of thing, be warned, Bazster is a know all who does not know as much as he thinks he does.

TD, methinks you are confusing me with Buzby (concerning whom I agree with you, having crossed swords with him myself on at least one occasion).

bazster

Umkomaas wrote: »

Harsh TD, very harsh.

I've re-read the thread and I can find no input by Bazster to the OP in any way, other than one tongue-in-cheek comment after the case was all settled, and one link which was confirming that a set aside fee is £155. Care to quote other inputs from him on this case?

Mistaken identity, that's all.

Umkomaas

bazster wrote: »

Mistaken identity, that's all.

:rotfl:

Oh dear, age doesn't come alone!

I thought it a bit strange as I was under the impression you'd met his criteria for the occasional push on the 'Thanks' button.

Sangria induced posting. Daft owd chop!

The_Deep

Oh dear me, I apologise most sincerely old man, I am at my Spanish abode and have perhaps been overindulgent with the Rioja.

soton_25

This is the funniest thread I have read in ages. And all pretty unintentional. Fishy story, mud slinging, mistaken identify and Rioja. Its a great combo.

Guys keep doing what you are doing... don't ever stop. You help loads of people who have unfairly, or accidentally been slapped with a disproportionate invoice.

Umkomaas

A bit of lighthearted banter between regulars helps brighten some of the Groundhog Days we frequently have to wade through.

By the way TD, your Bazstergate posting was at 4.17am - that couldn't have been the first bottle of vino tinto you opened last night - hic!