I'm so angry! Train Manager with attitude!

mpython

Please stop feeding the trolls ... it just encourages them.

marleyboy

I think the stalking is the wrong word to use, Harrasment is the legal jibe, and as it is, in following you (even breifly) off the train, whilst showing an aggressive attitude against you, in law it is known as harrassment. It is a fair judgement that he has probably done this kind of thing before and at least once been reported for it, so it must be on record with his superiors, chances are, your reporting of it, will certainly ensure he cannot do it again, at least with their company. Its a shame you didnt have the girls address, or the gentleman's, I am sure would be more than happy to act as your witness, witnesses can prove vital should the matter be handled in a court.

Dave_Brooker

marleyboy wrote: »

I think the stalking is the wrong word to use, Harrasment is the legal jibe, and as it is, in following you (even breifly) off the train, whilst showing an aggressive attitude against you, in law it is known as harrassment. It is a fair judgement that he has probably done this kind of thing before and at least once been reported for it, so it must be on record with his superiors, chances are, your reporting of it, will certainly ensure he cannot do it again, at least with their company. Its a shame you didnt have the girls address, or the gentleman's, I am sure would be more than happy to act as your witness, witnesses can prove vital should the matter be handled in a court.

Why would it end up in court??????

Nobody ever ends up in court for shouting at someone.

What planet do you people live on???

grannybroon

I think this one has run its course. Don't you think?

niccy

Dave_Brooker wrote: »

Nobody ever ends up in court for shouting at someone.

couldn't have been me in court in 1981 then:o

Im wiv Marleyboy a good smack to teach him a lesson he'd remember:rotfl:

Dave_Brooker

niccy wrote: »

couldn't have been me in court in 1981 then:o

Im wiv Marleyboy a good smack to teach him a lesson he'd remember:rotfl:

So give workers who's attitude you don't like a good kicking to teach them a lesson?

niccy

workers !!!

who said just workers.

anyone with a bad attitude;)

and hey why stop there,

lets vote for politicians who can send armys to sort out others with bad attitudes:rotfl:

Dave_Brooker

niccy wrote: »

workers !!!

who said just workers.

anyone with a bad attitude;)

and hey why stop there,

lets vote for politicians who can send armys to sort out others with bad attitudes:rotfl:

Has it ever dawned upon you that it might be your attitude at fault?

niccy

Dave_Brooker wrote: »

Has it ever dawned upon you that it might be your attitude at fault?

it did to my doctor,thats why he gave me those pills i think:j

dangeroussports

marleyboy wrote: »

I think the stalking is the wrong word to use, Harrasment is the legal jibe, and as it is, in following you (even breifly) off the train, whilst showing an aggressive attitude against you, in law it is known as harrassment. It is a fair judgement that he has probably done this kind of thing before and at least once been reported for it, so it must be on record with his superiors, chances are, your reporting of it, will certainly ensure he cannot do it again, at least with their company. Its a shame you didnt have the girls address, or the gentleman's, I am sure would be more than happy to act as your witness, witnesses can prove vital should the matter be handled in a court.

You are completely incorrect. For harrasment there has to be a course of conduct, i.e twice (but not consecutively i.e once at 10:30am and 10:31am).

Therefore he didnt cause arrestable harrasment. In any event he would have to harrass the same person twice.

If you are right then please provide a link otherwise goto bed.