We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Out of warranty iPhone 5 -Faulty
Hi everyone,
I have an iPhone 5, purchased through Orange on a 24 month contract in October 2012. Recently it has developed a fault with the speaker, so now makes no sound whatsoever - pretty unusable really. I have been the Apple store to see what they say and fairly, they informed me it is out of warranty and will cost £50 to repair. However he mentioned that i should follow this issue up with Orange/EE first as clearly the device is not fit for purpose and has developed an issue to no fault of my own. He was talking about EU consumer law, I have googled the issue but haven't been able to make much sense of the situation and where i stand. Is anyone able to advise me on what action to take and what to do next? Any opinions and assistance is greatly appreciated,
Thanks.
I have an iPhone 5, purchased through Orange on a 24 month contract in October 2012. Recently it has developed a fault with the speaker, so now makes no sound whatsoever - pretty unusable really. I have been the Apple store to see what they say and fairly, they informed me it is out of warranty and will cost £50 to repair. However he mentioned that i should follow this issue up with Orange/EE first as clearly the device is not fit for purpose and has developed an issue to no fault of my own. He was talking about EU consumer law, I have googled the issue but haven't been able to make much sense of the situation and where i stand. Is anyone able to advise me on what action to take and what to do next? Any opinions and assistance is greatly appreciated,
Thanks.
0
Comments
-
Orange/EE won't do anything unless you can prove that the phone was faulty at point of purchase. This is the rule of the Sale of Goods Act.I spent 25 years in the mobile industry, from 1994 to 2019. Worked for indies as well as the big networks, in their stores also in contact centres. I also hold a degree in telecoms engineering so I like to think I know what I’m talking about 😂0
-
Not quite. After six months, if the supplier disputes the cause of the defect, then the consumer might need to prove that the defect was not caused by misuse, accidental damage, or wear and tear etc.Orange/EE won't do anything unless you can prove that the phone was faulty at point of purchase. This is the rule of the Sale of Goods Act.
Where goods are supplied as a standalone product, the Sale of Goods Act 1979 applies. However, where goods are supplied in conjunction with a service and particularly where payments for the service wholly or partially cover the cost of the goods (as is the case here), the relevant legislation is Section 11N of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 which obliges the supplier (not the manufacturer) to repair or replace defective goods free of charge if they develop a defect within a reasonable time after their supply. This legislation is over 30 years old and has been well tested in court. The law doesn't define what a reasonable time is, but where goods are supplied in conjunction with a service, a court would determine a reasonable time to be at least the minimum duration of the service contract. The maximum time is limited to six years by Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980.
It is irrelevant that the network has separate written agreements for the goods and the service because:- The network supplied the goods with the intention that they be used with the service.
- The goods were supplied at the price paid on condition of entering into the contract for service.
- The goods were funded, either partially or fully, by the monthly charge for service.
- The goods were supplied at the same time that the service started.
- The goods and service were marketed as a package.
There are several contributors to this forum who persistently post incorrect advice about this subject, often spouting out the same drivel given by poorly trained employees of the networks. On the other hand, I have checked this with a specialist consumer solicitor, and if you want to verify my advice, I suggest you go to a Citizens Advice Bureau.0 -
Orange/EE won't do anything unless you can prove that the phone was faulty at point of purchase. This is the rule of the Sale of Goods Act.
Thanks for your response Simax. Do I not really have a case? Or will I have to somehow prove that the fault was there when purchased and it has simply deteriorated over time and finally become an issue?
Thanks!0 -
Thanks for your detailed response, NFH! That looks like some very interesting, useful information. There happens to be several EE stores in the town I work in so I will speak to someone in store and see what they have to say. I thought the situation seemed somewhat unfair but that information seems much more positive.
Thanks again, I'll post on here what I am told by EE tomorrow.0 -
If Orange disputes that the goods were defective at the time of supply, then you would have to obtain an independent report as explained above. Section 18(3)(e) of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 requires that the goods be durable. If a defect manifests itself months or years later and there was no misuse, accidental damage or wear and tear, then it follows that the goods were not durable at the time of supply. This is what an independent report would confirm.Or will I have to somehow prove that the fault was there when purchased and it has simply deteriorated over time and finally become an issue?
What is more likely is that Orange will tell you that you have no rights after the warranty expires, in which case you should quote the above legislation to them and report them to Trading Standards for the above offence under Regulation 9.0 -
-
Thanks for both replies. Thanks NFH for the information, I feel much more confident and prepared to go and speak to someone at EE tomorrow. Cheers for your informative replies, I'll update tomorrow!0
-
Hi again, finally managed to go into EE today. Just as suggested, they didn't want to know. They insisted it was not even their problem and I should go to Apple for a repair or replacement (already visited apple last week.)
After asked to speak to the manager who was reluctant to come out and speak to me, I ended up having to go back to work. What would you suggest is the next step I should take? Contact EE's head office?
Thanks again!0 -
What would you suggest is the next step I should take? !
As NFH posted, you will probably need to get an independant report now to show that the fault is inherent and not due to consumer misuse.If Orange disputes that the goods were defective at the time of supply, then you would have to obtain an independent report as explained above.0 -
The only ways are:
Send Orange a letter before action giving them, say, 10 days to collect the phone and repair or replace it under the SoGA.
If they fail to do this, then either- Get a report proving that the fault isn't a result of misuse/damage and sue Orange for for the market value of the phone plus cost of the report plus inconvenience.
- Have it repaired with a report and sue Orange for the cost of repair plus inconvenience.
How to complain: Know your consumer rights and how to use them...0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.8K Spending & Discounts
- 246.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.9K Life & Family
- 260.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
