Dangerous driving - follow up

goonarmy

Captain_Flack. wrote: »

Probably not as you'll get an educated argument there.

So you dont frequent it either then?

Captain_Flack.

goonarmy wrote: »

So you dont frequent it either then?

I knew what it was, unlike some. :whistle:

goonarmy

Captain_Flack. wrote: »

I knew what it was, unlike some. :whistle:

And thats to be comended? No.

Captain_Flack.

goonarmy wrote: »

And thats to be comended? No.

10 1/2 hours and that's the best you can come up with?

goonarmy

Captain_Flack. wrote: »

10 1/2 hours and that's the best you can come up with?

It needs no more.

Captain_Flack.

goonarmy wrote: »

It needs no more.

The irony of your signature.

goonarmy

Captain_Flack. wrote: »

The irony of your signature.

Appears you dont understand irony. It makes no comment on my post only others.


i take it jamie isnt on line?

ado

The o/p actually makes a valid point about what many members of the public expect from the police and what in turn the police should encourage, the trouble is though the police don't have the resources to deal with something like this and don't want to have anything to do with it. As a PC I can see why the latter has arisen as in this example there is little evidence except on word against another along with the possibility of CCTV which may or may not show anything. Despite that though the o/p's motives for informing the police are positive but he now feels let down due to the expected lack of response.

Captain_Flack.

ado wrote: »

The o/p actually makes a valid point about what many members of the public expect from the police and what in turn the police should encourage, the trouble is though the police don't have the resources to deal with something like this and don't want to have anything to do with it. As a PC I can see why the latter has arisen as in this example there is little evidence except on word against another along with the possibility of CCTV which may or may not show anything. Despite that though the o/p's motives for informing the police are positive but he now feels let down due to the expected lack of response.

He can hardly feel let down due to the lack of response. He posted on the day it happened and was told they would follow it up.

Jamie_Carter

Captain_Flack. wrote: »

So what if they are banned?

There is no evidence a disqualified driver was driving as the op can't name the driver.

The report will still go onto the database for that vehicle. And this could well have a bearing if the car is stopped for similar offence, and help the officers decide if they should just give the driver a warning, or should take other action.