We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Fence down.........
Comments
-
[Deleted User] wrote:
Well all I can say is that my insurance company have assured me this is not the case at all.
You have to admit it sounds a bit crazy.Stopped smoking 27/12/2007, but could start again at any time :eek:0 -
Well all I can say is that my insurance company have assured me this is not the case at all.
You have to admit it sounds a bit crazy.
You are very lucky. TSB did this to us and upped our excess to £300. Had been with them for years and only ever claimed once. We moved to another company and told the new insurer which was noted on our policy. xxRIP TJ. You my be gone, but never forgotten. Always in our hearts xxxHe is your friend, your partner, your defender, your dog.You are his life, his love, his leader.He will be yours, faithful and true, to the last beat of his heart.You owe it to him to be worthy of such devotion.0 -
Well all I can say is that my insurance company have assured me this is not the case at all.
You have to admit it sounds a bit crazy.
What your insurers deem as a claim maybe different to what others deem a claim. You need to be careful with the disclosure questions as if it asks about general incidents then it will require disclosure as it will likely have been recorded on CUE if the insurers set up any form of electronic file for it.0 -
Well all I can say is that my insurance company have assured me this is not the case at all.
You have to admit it sounds a bit crazy.
Who told you this from your insurers? You need this confirming back to you in writing.
The question you are asked about previous history is along tbe lines of "have you had any claims or losses in the last x years". Nothing your present insurer has told you relieves you from disclosing this loss, unless of course you remain with them.
As long as you have it in writing you will have a "defence" should this issue cause any problem in future years.0 -
Well if you dont tell them who you are when you make the general enquiry they certainly cant update your records.
Either that or state you are asking a "hypothetical question"0 -
superbigal36 wrote: »Well if you dont tell them who you are when you make the general enquiry they certainly cant update your records.
Either that or state you are asking a "hypothetical question"
Oh they knew who I was, they asked me the policy number.
Should be alright though as no insurance company appears to cover storm damage to fences.Stopped smoking 27/12/2007, but could start again at any time :eek:0 -
Supposing your fence hasn't blown down, but you are just asking the hypothetical question would it be covered if it did?
Does that make you the kind of risky person whose fence might blow down?
We were told in another thread that as long as the rising floodwater has not yet reached your house, you would still be covered if you took out immediate flood cover.
So you would not be penalised for taking out cover for a known risk, but would be if you merely asked hypothetically whether such a risk was covered?This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
[Deleted User] wrote:
oh dear, another who believes what they read in the daily newspapers....The questions that get the best answers are the questions that give most detail....0 -
Clifford_Pope wrote: »Supposing your fence hasn't blown down, but you are just asking the hypothetical question would it be covered if it did?
Does that make you the kind of risky person whose fence might blow down?
We were told in another thread that as long as the rising floodwater has not yet reached your house, you would still be covered if you took out immediate flood cover.
So you would not be penalised for taking out cover for a known risk, but would be if you merely asked hypothetically whether such a risk was covered?
I think that all insurance companies are well aware of the adverse weather conditions currently being experienced.
I don't think I have ever made a claim on home insurance, so I don't think I am a risky person:(Stopped smoking 27/12/2007, but could start again at any time :eek:0 -
oh dear, another who believes what they read in the daily newspapers....
Exactly, if this were indeed the case, then nobody would dare telephone their insurance company with any kind of query, which is totally ridiculous.
I am sure they are being inundated with enquiries at the moment about far more serious things than fences blowing down;)Stopped smoking 27/12/2007, but could start again at any time :eek:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards