Parking Eye court stage

bod1467

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4778137

Is that thread about the same location?

salmosalaris

PP isn't an issue here. The landowners are Tyne and Wear Pension fund and I'm pretty sure there was an FOI request to South Tyneside Council

Gary_zero

DollyDee wrote: »

Is this Aldi at Corporation Street?

Someone posted on Facebook in September that the Planning Permission was for 3 hours and offsite usage.

I can't find any information on this can anyone post a link please

DollyDee_2

I'm not on facebook, I did a google search and came up with:-

https://www.facebook.com/AldiUK/posts/595211600539646

go to 4th post from the bottom.

But Salmosalaris is looking into it from a different angle.

Gary_zero

DollyDee wrote: »

I'm not on facebook, I did a google search and came up with:-

https://www.facebook.com/AldiUK/posts/595211600539646

go to 4th post from the bottom.

But Salmosalaris is looking into it from a different angle.

I've read a few mentions of the 3 hours but no documents or references that a court would accept are there any. Thanks.

DollyDee_2

You would have to ask the Planning Office/Dept at the council about planning application/consent or see if you can view it online on the council's website.

salmosalaris

If this were me I would go to a hearing . I would FOI request South Tyneside Council asking for copies of any contracts between Parking Eye and the landowner Tyne and Wear Pension Fund in place on the day in question . This gets round the silly witness statement problem. As their agent , Parking Eye , must have clear authority to offer/enter into contracts and litigate in their own name as they are clearly not acting on behalf of the pension fund but for themselves .
Personally I think they're offering a paper only hearing to avoid costs but if you could get hold of any documentation in place that doesn't grant this authority they are pretty stuffed. . If you can get this request back in time and it is beneficial to your case you could submit it for a papers only hearing if you want to avoid you the stress of court.
What stage are you at with the claim for an idea of timescales ?

However I am not you and you must decide what suits you best .
For some paying £50 is the answer for others it is to fight on .

martmonk

salmosalaris wrote: »

PP isn't an issue here. The landowners are Tyne and Wear Pension fund and I'm pretty sure there was an FOI request to South Tyneside Council

Maybe I'm just not keeping up but I'm confused.

If this is corporation street in Preston, what has South Tyneside got to do with things?

Gary_zero

salmosalaris wrote: »

If this were me I would go to a hearing . I would FOI request South Tyneside Council asking for copies of any contracts between Parking Eye and the landowner Tyne and Wear Pension Fund in place on the day in question .

I'm confused it's preston council

spacey2012

Wow has kirkby lost the plot, or perhaps he is on the Books at parking Eye now, certainly singing from the Parking hymn sheet of late.

If you are in receipt of stamped court papers, log in and select defend whole case to buy time.
I think you may be reading the twaddle parking eye send and confusing it with actual court information.
Only take the instructions from the court as real and anything parking eye send as been written by a complete moron on £6.67 an hour.

If you have stamped court papers, I would not trust parking eye as far as you can throw them, they will lose the £50 and hope for an easy default claim.
Once at this stage you must take them on.

The £50 is the solicitors fee which means the principle has cancelled, as parking eyes contract is with the principal once they are instructed to cancel, they have no contract with you and any loss they claim is down to the person contracting them.

Please clear up, do you have a set of stamped court papers, or just a begging letter from parking eye.