ParkingEye. Letter before county Court

Redx

if pasting onto here, what I suggest is copy and paste into NOTEPAD on your pc first, and save it

then copy and paste from NOTEPAD onto here , that should fix any formatting issues between word and this forum

try it and see , cant do any harm

thanks

ps:- in 4 , you still have 2 fours, there should be "only one", possibly alter the quotes too on that second 4 , or delete them ?

plus , - the last line in 3 should not be there ?

Coupon-mad

Take the blue link off and the bold off 'ParkingEye v Fox-Jones
8 Nov 2013 ...as you don't need to show POPLA a link.

As yep, as Redx says you don't want this line: 'Signs are generally positioned to face oncoming traffic, rather than parallel to it' because that's referring to a no-stopping zone only.

ken979

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Take the blue link off and the bold off 'ParkingEye v Fox-Jones
8 Nov 2013 ...as you don't need to show POPLA a link.

As yep, as Redx says you don't want this line: 'Signs are generally positioned to face oncoming traffic, rather than parallel to it' because that's referring to a no-stopping zone only.

Hello Coupon-mad and Redx,

Hope you are both well I have made the edits above. Is there anything else I could improve on?

Thanks

Redx

spelling here

section 4

when clearly I was aloud it in the first place. Because of the Breach To Popla I should get this charge dismissed. There are many of these cases on the Pubic Domain. A Quote from one of there template letters:

and its Fox - Jones , not fov later on in the bottom part of 5

allowed , their , in , Fox

edit , added the highlight for on as it should be in from post #66 below

bod1467

cases on in the Public Domain

ken979

The Appeal date is 24th January and I can upload the evidence up until that point.

@RedX. I will edit it soon My English is terrible

Redx

ok, well edit it and I feel its good to go, dont wait until the last minute and have it expire as there are no third chances (you are already on your second chance due to coupon-mad`s letter)

ken979

ken979 wrote: »

Updated letter

3. The signage was not compliant with the BPA Code of Practice so there was no valid contract formed between ParkingEye and the driver

Upon re-visiting the site, it is clearly apparent that the driver on the day has noticed ParkingEye has failed to properly warn/inform the driver of the terms and any consequences for breach. This has failed to comply with the BPA Code of Practice section 18 and appendix B. ParkingEye are a mere agent and place their signs so high, they have failed to establish the elements of a contract (consideration/offer and acceptance). ParkingEye have no signage with full terms which could ever be readable at eye level, for a driver in moving traffic on arrival. If a contract is to be formed, upon entering the site a driver must be able to read, understand and agree to the terms and conditions. A driver could not stop in order to read the signs as they enter the road as they by doing so they would block the junction. Any alleged contract would be formed at the entrance to the premises, prior to parking. It is not formed after the vehicle has already been parked, as this is too late.

I'm not sure whether to leave this out or not. I went back to the site and relies the sign's are at eye level and read able as well. The others part's of the letter I wrote is perfect. This is the only part I feel doesn't help.

What are you opinions?

Redx

how about adapting the one in this thread here ? https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/63291442#Comment_63291442

the point is to make them prove their signage is compliant, so dont do their job for them in proving otherwise or not

so I would omit certain sections but put the onus of proof onto them to prove IT IS compliant

ie:- take out the first paragraph and change the PPC name to PE

regards

Dave_TH

ken979 wrote: »

The Appeal date is 24th January and I can upload the evidence up until that point.

@RedX. I will edit it soon My English is terrible

suggest you upload sooner rather than later, you can always add more up to the appeal date, I have done 2 cases today and will add more detail when I return from my holiday, I have seen a couple of extra points worth adding