We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Grangemouth dispute: Ineos says petrochemical plant will close
Comments
-
The employees and unions have agreed to a 3 year pay freeze and 'modern' pension scheme (probably a money purchase). I can't see how the government can keep skirting the issue of public sector final salary pensions when yet another private sector one closes because they are unsustainable.
Employers cannot afford them, neither can/should the taxpayer.
Already are being addressed. Employee contributions have risen considerably. Civil Service scheme gets major revision in 2015.
Being heavily unionised results in every detail having to be negotiated.0 -
-
Not sure where you are coming from, as I said it wasn't a game.Thrugelmir wrote: »Would you invest £300 million into a business if you had a work force that would walk out at the slightest excuse.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Already are being addressed. Employee contributions have risen considerably. Civil Service scheme gets major revision in 2015.
Being heavily unionised results in every detail having to be negotiated.
That's not addressing the problem, that's just tinkering around the edges. The problem is the huge liability final salaries place on the employer (and the country). All of the investment risk is placed with the employer, none on the employee. Companies and governments are not investment houses or pension providers, they should just pay a portion of the employee's salary into a pension pot controlled by the employee and that's that.0 -
I think there will soon be a vacancy at UNITE Scotland if anyone is interested

On the news this evening Pat Rafferty looked a broken man, stuttering away, far different to the confident interviews he was giving when he thought he held all the aces.0 -
Separated at birth ?

0 -
That's not addressing the problem, that's just tinkering around the edges.
Patience, takes time to address complex issues. The real impact will be felt once public sector employees are TUPED into the private sector. Then the savings will really kick in. There's plenty going on, with a long term view.
Tip of the iceberg.DWP, Defra and Environment Agency to outsource to Steria -
http://www.information-age.com/it-management/outsourcing-and-supplier-management/123457345/dwp--defra-and-environment-agency-to-outsource-to-steria0 -
One point of the agreement that is not being mentioned by many of the news channels is that there will be no full time union convenors on site, a very big move for a large heavily unionised site. The original dispute was over the company handling of one of the convenors being accused of using company facilities for Labour party election purposes and the union called for a strike before the results of the disciplinary enquiry were published. A real bloody nose for UNITE.0
-
One Scottish newspaper was saying the site is worth 4bn to the Scottish Economy, I guess this figure includes not only corporation taxes, but also the employee's salaries that are taxed and the remainder used to buy goods in the wider Scottish economy. Replace those wages with lower ones or unemployment benefits and you can see how devastating this is for the SNP in the lead up to their independance vote. Especially as BASF has also announced a closure and job losses (albeit nothing on this scale).
The SNP's 'one trick pony' of relying on a single income stream (oil) is becoming a little lame.
And, pray tell, how would more Westminster maladministration get Scotland out of this mess that it must have got it into in the first place?There is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Already are being addressed. Employee contributions have risen considerably. Civil Service scheme gets major revision in 2015.
Being heavily unionised results in every detail having to be negotiated.
That was my thought too. I have a public sector pension and it is not final salary (career average). It is not a bad deal, but it is not as good as the pensions that most people think we have. I have to put more in and get a lower rate of return than previous schemes.Please stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
