Problem at work, need some quick advice....

goonarmy

Southend1 wrote: »

Hallelujah!

Perhaps this thread can be laid to rest now

I dont see how, surely the ops the one to close this matter out? Also didnt get to see the post you quoted so im guessing it werent the op

Southend1

goonarmy wrote: »

I dont see how, surely the ops the one to close this matter out? Also didnt get to see the post you quoted so im guessing it werent the op

I was quoting ValHaller, who was quoting you, from the post where you finally agreed with the point you have been arguing against for the last six pages or so!

Southend1

goonarmy wrote: »

And it would be water off a ducks back regardless. I make no assumptons of anything other than your posts on here. Why would you assume otherwise? Cant rember commenting on your career successes or failings-they are of no interest to me.

You said...

"convinced but not educated on matters that they are so adament about"

Which was an assumption that I am not educated on matters that I am adamant about. While I may or may not be, you have no way of knowing, therefore you assumed.

jc808

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

goonarmy

Southend1 wrote: »

You said...

"convinced but not educated on matters that they are so adament about"

Which was an assumption that I am not educated on matters that I am adamant about. While I may or may not be, you have no way of knowing, therefore you assumed.

So you are educated in these matters? And yes its an assumption made using the posts you wrote. Just like i said when i wrote

goonarmy wrote: »

I make no assumptons of anything other than your posts on here.

So you have confirmed that for me well done.

goonarmy

jc808 wrote: »

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I was doing the same at ten to six this morning.

goonarmy

Southend1 wrote: »

I was quoting ValHaller, who was quoting you, from the post where you finally agreed with the point you have been arguing against for the last six pages or so!

Hang on. I think you have it wrong. Please could you direct quote the point you making as i feel i havent agreed with any point that ive argued against. The fault lies with the op(see, bringing it back on topic:j) and that hasnt changed.

scooby088

Let it rest this is getting infantile now, the OP hasn't been back to reply to anything as I would assume he/she is getting a great laugh just reading this thread.

ValHaller

goonarmy wrote: »

Hang on. I think you have it wrong. Please could you direct quote the point you making as i feel i havent agreed with any point that ive argued against. The fault lies with the op(see, bringing it back on topic:j) and that hasnt changed.

I think that is called arson.

goonarmy

scooby088 wrote: »

Let it rest this is getting infantile now, the OP hasn't been back to reply to anything as I would assume he/she is getting a great laugh just reading this thread.

Anything else you would like?