Problem at work, need some quick advice....

Dovah_diva

goonarmy wrote: »

I told you what tenacity was. And that was certainly guessable what with it being anothr vowel. I think its you being arguementive with your "minimum requirements". How dare you. Where do you get the gall? If you "expect" then i suggest you go elsewhere.

You told us what tenacity was, and then said

goonarmy wrote: »

And the the other word was magical. Which in no way derives from the point being made.

I assume that you mean detracts as derives means to obtain something from (a specified source), which makes no sense in this context. Which is kind of the point I have been trying to make. When you write garbled nonsense people either spend ages trying to decipher your meaning or give up. Therefore, any valid points you are trying to make are lost. Now, this impinges on my life not one jot, as I am quite articulate. I was merely trying to help you. However, as you appear to have taken great offence, I shall leave it there and bow out.

I wish you good day, Sir.

ValHaller

goonarmy wrote: »

Repetition does not make the point more valid. It is the op at fault.

We all know that OP has an issue here. But

A) unwanted touching is always unacceptable
OPs views on "inferior" people seem to indicate he has a poor attitude towards some coworkers.

Just because may be the case that doesn't mean A) is invalidated.

It does not come clearer than that

Southend1

Is this really still going on?

*Sigh*

goonarmy

ValHaller wrote: »

We all know that OP has an issue here. But

A) unwanted touching is always unacceptable
OPs views on "inferior" people seem to indicate he has a poor attitude towards some coworkers.

Just because may be the case that doesn't mean A) is invalidated.

It does not come clearer than that

Is your copy and paste stuck on? And also still wrong.

goonarmy

Dovah_diva wrote: »

You told us what tenacity was, and then said



I assume that you mean detracts as derives means to obtain something from (a specified source), which makes no sense in this context. Which is kind of the point I have been trying to make. When you write garbled nonsense people either spend ages trying to decipher your meaning or give up. Therefore, any valid points you are trying to make are lost. Now, this impinges on my life not one jot, as I am quite articulate. I was merely trying to help you. However, as you appear to have taken great offence, I shall leave it there and bow out.

I wish you good day, Sir.

You were not trying to help me. In the slightest.
In your posts your rewarding your self with a sense of worth. That is all. No more. No less.

goonarmy

Southend1 wrote: »

Is this really still going on?

*Sigh*

Its a forum. Thats how the system works.
*facepalm*

Dovah_diva

Southend1 wrote: »

Is this really still going on?

*Sigh*

I know, right?

goonarmy

Dovah_diva wrote: »

I know, right?

And yet we carry it on.....

ValHaller

goonarmy wrote: »

Is your copy and paste stuck on? And also still wrong.

Your sole thesis appears to be B. But B is not an excuse to violate A

A) unwanted touching is always unacceptable
OPs views on "inferior" people seem to indicate he has a poor attitude towards some coworkers.

Just because may be the case that doesn't mean A) is invalidated.

It does not come clearer than that

goonarmy

ValHaller wrote: »

Your sole thesis appears to be B. But B is not an excuse to violate A

A) unwanted touching is always unacceptable
OPs views on "inferior" people seem to indicate he has a poor attitude towards some coworkers.

Just because may be the case that doesn't mean A) is invalidated.

It does not come clearer than that

Oh i see!! Why didnt you say that before?????
So anyway now the sarcasm is done-the fault lies with the op and his attitude to others.