Biggest Threats to Cyclists?

custardy

WiggyDiggyPoo wrote: »

:beer:

Lost her job, fined and 7 points. Plus no £££ from Daybreak apparently. Now being cyber bullied apparently :rotfl:

I don't feel guilty in the slightest about been cheery she has suffered as such as she only seems to regret her actions because of the personal consequences, she still maintains the cyclist was 'disrespectful' (well wouldnt you be if someone hit and runned you) and blames her actions on her age.

Frankly she's a disgrace as she still does not see how it was her fault, despite the guilty verdict.


We won't know until we try and it doesnt have to be through the night but perhaps a rush hour ban could be a good start no LGVs 0700-0900 and 1600-1800 for example?

No money from Daybreak?
You really think she isnt getting paid?

gets worse

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-25013820

poor poor me

Norman_Castle

She told Daybreak: "I lost my job in accountancy and I've received really malicious threats and stuff off people... cyberbullying and stuff, so it has been quite bad."

Cyberbullying and stuff?. She has had an honest reaction to her actions. Its been deservedly bad.
She is a spoilt, self centred child who unfortunately still has a driving license.

WiggyDiggyPoo

custardy wrote: »

No money from Daybreak?
You really think she isnt getting paid?

gets worse

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-25013820

poor poor me

Not really no, but I've got nothing else to go on....

Lorraine Kelly: "You don't seem to very remorseful"

God Bless you Lorraine x

custardy

http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2013/nov/20/how-safe-are-worlds-cities-for-cyclists

007stuart

Well worth looking at.......


http://youtu.be/wzL0Kyk4m-8

armyknife

Biggest threat to cyclist's health, themselves; spending lots of time arguing the toss with fellow cyclists and trolls, none of whom are going to convince each other about hardly anything, time far better spent actually getting out and about on bikes, maintaining and broadening the proven health benefits.

If it's too cold out, why not fettle some bike stuff, do routine maintenance, rather than getting hot under the collar about someone being wrong on the interwebs?

custardy

armyknife wrote: »

Biggest threat to cyclist's health, themselves; spending lots of time arguing the toss with fellow cyclists and trolls, none of whom are going to convince each other about hardly anything, time far better spent actually getting out and about on bikes, maintaining and broadening the proven health benefits.

If it's too cold out, why not fettle some bike stuff, do routine maintenance, rather than getting hot under the collar about someone being wrong on the interwebs?

if its what?

carlosthejackal666

custardy wrote: »

if its what?

I think Rule #5 applies here.

Marco_Panettone

armyknife wrote: »

Biggest threat to cyclist's health, themselves; spending lots of time arguing the toss with fellow cyclists and trolls, none of whom are going to convince each other about hardly anything, time far better spent actually getting out and about on bikes, maintaining and broadening the proven health benefits.

If it's too cold out, why not fettle some bike stuff, do routine maintenance, rather than getting hot under the collar about someone being wrong on the interwebs?

I assume you have a youtube video to prove this...

:beer:

WiggyDiggyPoo

armyknife wrote: »

Biggest threat to cyclist's health, themselves; spending lots of time arguing the toss with fellow cyclists and trolls, none of whom are going to convince each other about hardly anything, time far better spent actually getting out and about on bikes, maintaining and broadening the proven health benefits.

If it's too cold out, why not fettle some bike stuff, do routine maintenance, rather than getting hot under the collar about someone being wrong on the interwebs?

:rotfl:

Because any topic that attracts crackpot do gooders to come and have their two penneth is worth keeping going just for the amusement alone:p