📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

2014 / 15 ISA allowance

Yes am keen - but hey ho.

So the allowance is typically incresed in line with CPI.

But my question is - when is the Autumn statement that this is announced? Normally end of Nov / early Dec but do we have an exact date please?

Regards
«134

Comments

  • Looter
    Looter Posts: 131 Forumite
    The next inflation figures are due out on 15 Oct according to the BOE home page so not long to go.
  • ColdIron
    ColdIron Posts: 9,911 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Hung up my suit! Name Dropper
    My money is on another meager £240 like last year
  • The Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne has announced that he will give his annual Autumn Statement to Parliament on 4 December 2013
    "Look after your pennies and your pounds will look after themselves"
  • ffacoffipawb
    ffacoffipawb Posts: 3,593 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne has announced that he will give his annual Autumn Statement to Parliament on 4 December 2013

    That would make it a Winter Statement, surely?
  • That would make it a Winter Statement, surely?

    No, winter usually officially starts on December 21st.
    “In any moment of decision the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you can do is nothing at all.” - Roosevelt
  • Doshwaster
    Doshwaster Posts: 6,350 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Discussions about a lifetime limit for ISA holdings with £100,000 being suggested:
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/10373750/Are-politicians-about-to-start-tinkering-with-Isas.html
  • Archi_Bald
    Archi_Bald Posts: 9,681 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    That would be political suicide for the government. If they want to lose votes in droves, tinkering with ISAs would be a grand idea.
  • DragonQ
    DragonQ Posts: 2,198 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Archi_Bald wrote: »
    That would be political suicide for the government. If they want to lose votes in droves, tinkering with ISAs would be a grand idea.
    Doubt it. Most people don't have £100,000 in savings, in case you weren't aware.
  • Archi_Bald
    Archi_Bald Posts: 9,681 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    DragonQ wrote: »
    Doubt it. Most people don't have £100,000 in savings, in case you weren't aware.

    I do admit, I do not have hard and fast statistics at my disposition. You seem to have them, would you care to share them?

    I would say that millions of professionals have saved the max into ISAs (and PEPs previously) ever since they did become available. Naturally, most if not all of these ISAs have have grown way beyond their original deposit values.

    Also, there are millions of young professionals who have set themselves up the "ISA way" for their retirement savings. They might not have quite reached £100K, but they will have made a conscious decision to invest for their own future by means of an ISA.

    Fair enough, if the government can see a good case to restrict future tax-free savings and investment schemes for Joe Bloggs, they can probably argue a credible case. I say 'probably' because I can't see how they could possibly come up with anything better than people actually making their own provisions for their own financial needs.

    But a U-turn on taxing people on the provisions they have already made in the past for their long-term future would be a massively idiotic thing to do. Firstly, it would be a huge vote loser in typically conservative constituencies. Secondly, it would raise diddlysquat tax revenue in the grand scale of things. Upping corporation tax by 0.1%, or just making sure Vodafone and/or Philip Greene's wife etc actually pay all the tax they should be paying would yield a lot more money for the treasury.

    As an aside, none of this would of course make much sense to your typical tabloid reader. They would just stupidly chant for punishment of those who have made and are making provisions for themselves.
  • Yorkie1
    Yorkie1 Posts: 12,085 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I agree with Archi Bald. Savers are already feeling the pinch from the dire rate of interest on their savings - partly because of the money going into the banks from the government's mortgage schemes (for want of a better descriptor). Pensioners are seeing their income drop and many people in the middle of their lives are planning through ISAs for sufficient income to produce a decent quality of living.

    I also agree that as many people won't have such sums available, the politics of envy will come into play and give the government a boost in the arm in the popularity stakes.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.