We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Partial Refund Query & 6 year claim

13»

Comments

  • Jakg
    Jakg Posts: 2,267 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I think the retailer has been MORE than reasonable.

    Shows you what they get for doing so...
    Nothing I say represents any past, present or future employer.
  • So they actually make a good offer and then get someone being unreasonable and kicking up a fuss for good reason?
    If you're reading this currys, good on you... but I think given how ungrateful some people are I'd not be as generous next time!
  • duck1978 wrote: »
    I have also sent a letter to my CC company under section 75 but not holding me breath

    Omg I can't believe you've gone that far, you're being way unreasonable here.

    Even ThumbRemote doesn't agree and that is saying something!
  • arcon5
    arcon5 Posts: 14,099 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Assuming linear depreciation that is. Many consumer electronics will loose significant portions of its value in the first year or two. Then by year 4 have a poultry resale value.

    This figure looks very generous to me.
    Some retailers may have even sought out the average price of a similar age set and offered that amount.
  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    Depreciation already covered in post #13. ;)

    PS - it's paltry not poultry. (Unless you really DO mean chickens, turkeys etc.) :D

    (Sorry - couldn't resist. Just pulling your leg). :)
  • Arcon makes a great point - electronics would almost never depreciate in a linear fashion, they are like cars. Worth a hell of a lot less as soon as someone owns it!
    Thinking critically since 1996....
  • duck1978
    duck1978 Posts: 14 Forumite
    Right guys,

    I have gone for that offer, I was just trying to gauge an opinion.

    As for people who think I'm being unreasonable or the retailer is being more than fair from a few paragraphs I have written about a particular point and not the service in a whole I received.

    As for an offer I think is fair, I think I was right in thinking a TV should last 10 years, why wouldn't it. I own 3 tv's that have surpassed 7 years and one of them is 15 years old. My father inlaws Toshiba was over 15 years too when he replaced it, not for a fault but he wanted a new one. Why would a TV of £200 be any inferior to a TV that is £3500. Would you just assume it would not last aslong. If you have a Samsung that is £500 and they sell some for £4000 why would my Samsung not last as long
  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    Design? Materials? Production processes?

    Whilst it's not an absolute, the old adage of "you get what you pay for" generally holds true. Something almost 10x the price of a similar type of item (TVs in this case) will be expected to last much longer than the cheaper item.

    That doesn't mean the cheaper item is expected to fail quickly, just that you shouldn't expect both items to have the same life span.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.