We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Nice People Thread Part 9 - and so it continues
Comments
-
Rest of our fence blew down (which we were expecting) but now I am wondering whether to claim on buildings ins. We have never made a claim in 17 years at this house.
If we do, would our premium go sky high (so the saving ends up costing more in the long run in higher premiums)?
Check your policy. The chances are very high that garden fences are excluded. So, looking on the bright side, at least that's one thing you don't have to worry about.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
chewmylegoff wrote: »I received 3 emails all day which suggests the office wasn't particularly busy!
Our office felt like it was 5.15 on a Friday pretty much all day. I think it was more to do with half term than the weather though.0 -
-
Bins were blown over but everything else surprisingly untouched. Branches down in the park but no trees knocked over.
Drove DS to shops (no trains but buses all running). Town centre was mobbed, took ages to park. Had to text my p and m as if they hear of anything bad happening in the South of England they assume I'm the victim.
There is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker0 -
Frequency of sex with age doesn't sound like it changes at all:
30 - 40 year olds : tri-weekly
40 - 50 year olds : try weekly
50 + year olds : try weakly
Well, for these 30-40 year olds - not-being-pregnant, an awful lot more. Being pregnant, at the moment anyway, with massive nausea, definitely not hitting thrice-weekly!...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0 -
lostinrates wrote: »The michaels family are lovely yorkie,
The family are lovely, just a shame about Michaelslostinrates wrote: »I mean, they have ones he likes that I don't and that I do that he doesn't.
Hmm - there must be a solution but I just can't think what it is...Just need to make sure they don't go out of date
If I wasn't married I would definitely take you up on the offerI think....0 -
Seeing pics of huge trees which have been felled by a storm always makes me feel sad - the tree has survived for so many years, but is now no more.
If it's in a woodland, then it carries on being part of the eco-system for years, becoming home to endless creepy-crawlies, sheltering hedgehogs, growing fungi, etc. Not necessarily an abrupt stop.lostinrates wrote: »DH said office was dead today.
Very quiet in central London today - half the stalls on Whitecross Market weren't there, and there were a couple of trees down on the pavements at Old Street, too....much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0 -
Hmm - there must be a solution but I just can't think what it is...
(
The non Mse one is to just spend more on the ones that make both of us happy, surely. The alternative is that one of us accept that the on doms aren't their preference and just suck it up. Now, I'm falling in to old habits, must stop it.:whistle: its how you are reading it.
Omg, bad typo, bad , bad typo. On doms was meant to be condoms, Obviously.0 -
lostinrates wrote: »The non Mse one is to just spend more on the ones that make both of us happy, surely. The alternative is that one of us accept that the on doms aren't their preference and just suck it up. Now, I'm falling in to old habits, must stop it.
:whistle: its how you are reading it.
I am going to show my age here...why do married couples need to use these for contraception.
I am assuming it is safe because of the 'married' bit. That is how I think it works.0 -
lostinrates wrote: »The non Mse one is to just spend more on the ones that make both of us happy, surely. The alternative is that one of us accept that the on doms aren't their preference and just suck it up. Now, I'm falling in to old habits, must stop it.
:whistle: its how you are reading it.
I was thinking the mse way would be to find another couple with the opposite preferences....I think....0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards