child leaving college and csa

his_wife

No we dont. chb must be in payment to recive maintenance, but its not a "qualifyer" its a very good sign, but it doesnt mean we have to pay maintenance becuase of it, i didnt really read the bit about unlawful, the csa is determined by child support law, who do you think writes that? the clue is in the title.


So if you dont have to pay maintenance because of child benefit being payable, why are we still paying it,,, as we have emailed the csa a copy of the letter stating the child is no longer in college,,,,, so there for the csa are wrongly taking money from us!!

kevin137

And here are the types of problems caused by reckless posting regarding the CSA by an employee that has no idea what legislation means and what the legal implications are...

@his wife, my suggesting would be to screen print the entire thread, take it to your MP and raise a formal complaint with the CSA...

Point them in the direction of this thread and the advice being given by an employee and see where that gets you...

After all, the only case you need to sort out is YOUR case, no one else's, and this gives you the ammunition to go further...!!!

his_wife

very true kevin,,, ive just showed my husband this , and he is spitting feathers, to save print screening, can i not just copy n paste the whole thread over to my mp, since i have the email address already in my address book,,,, see what they make of it,,, i will also copy and paste it to the csa complaints direct, since we have a new email address for them too.

pretzelnut

his_wife wrote: »

very true kevin,,, ive just showed my husband this , and he is spitting feathers, to save print screening, can i not just copy n paste the whole thread over to my mp, since i have the email address already in my address book,,,, see what they make of it,,, i will also copy and paste it to the csa complaints direct, since we have a new email address for them too.

Screen print, so you have proof of how it is exactly.

Plus the thread could disappear anytime.

his_wife

have copied and pasted it all too myself , and emailed it straight too mp office with a brief note of the important posts

Cally_Smart

his_wife wrote: »

No we dont. chb must be in payment to recive maintenance, but its not a "qualifyer" its a very good sign, but it doesnt mean we have to pay maintenance becuase of it, i didnt really read the bit about unlawful, the csa is determined by child support law, who do you think writes that? the clue is in the title.


So if you dont have to pay maintenance because of child benefit being payable, why are we still paying it,,, as we have emailed the csa a copy of the letter stating the child is no longer in college,,,,, so there for the csa are wrongly taking money from us!!

and us ... for 2 girls who haven't been at college at all this year,we asked for a Ch Of Circ told we couldn't have one !,we told them in Feb/mar when any run on would have expired,we told our MP.Nothing is happening for us and it's August now. Its wrong when we have paid from day one !

his_wife

Cally I really don't know what too say too you, our mp can't appear to help, child benefit won't speak to us,,, csa haven't a clue judging by this thread lol, surely someone somewhere must listen , do you have any proof qualifying children are no longer in education??

his_wife

CSAworkerx wrote: »

you litreally cannot read, so i have to make everything a battle or can you just re-read instead of jumping the gun everytime i comment.

as i stated.... "Your problem is the PWC will have told us she is enrolling into a new course, or allready has done so,"
this means, the pwc will have been asked on the phone if the QC is currently attending, or has enrolled into a new course, she will say she has, as if she says no we will cancel the claim
"and if chb is in payment that is enough evidence for us to class her as a QC"
This means, with both pieces of evidence, ( the chb check, and the pwc telling us shes attenting/enrolled into a course ) we will class her as a qualifiying child. As the PWC has a right to be belived, and it is not our job to question whether she is lieing to both us and CHB, we expect if its in payment, they are paying it becuase she is still classed as a child, this means its now up to the other party to prove she is not a qualifying child in the eyes of CHB, if this is done we also will not class her as one, as CHB has stopped for a reason.

im not going to disect a simple comment everytime people mis-read or mis-enterprate a comment, or just dont understand the process.

Sorry just re read this,,,we can prove she is not a qualifying child,,, we have done, just that csa won't listen as child benefit is still being paid so that overrides everything else!!!!!! Why does only the pwc have a right to be believed,,,,,,

Marisco

his_wife wrote: »

Sorry just re read this,,,we can prove she is not a qualifying child,,, we have done, just that csa won't listen as child benefit is still being paid so that overrides everything else!!!!!! Why does only the pwc have a right to be believed,,,,,,

Have you reported her to the DWP fraud team? You could also write to Ian D Smith, and threaten to go to the papers if something is not sorted! I know he's a plank, but his dept. is getting a lot of flack at the minute re money saving initiatives, it won't look good if the DWP are wasting money re fraudulent CB claims, as I'm sure you're not the only one in this position. Worth a go anyway, and tell the CSA what you are going to do! I'd be spitting nails as well!! :mad:

Cally_Smart

Thanks ,hiswife,I can remember reading about this problem in a lot of posts dated back years ago(when I started reading different CSA forum),I remember thinking well just don't pay it then! But as we know its not as easy as that, they can slap a DEO on you so quickly. If you show any sign of questioning the CSA decision you get talked to in a very patronising way like you are trying to avoid paying what is due. We just want the law to apply to nrp's as well. If they are so keen on the law & legislation they should get their staff to understand the small print in the very legislation they quote to us & act accordingly! I think it's a very good idea to screen save & highlight to our MP's exactly what is going on!