Parking "Contractual Payment Charge" - Sussex Security Solutions

Notters_the_seagull

Hovite wrote: »

Notters pictures :

The address made me snigger - a small room in a not very nice building and with "Brighton and Hove City" - that isn't a valid postal address. Maybe I should send them a "fine" on behalf of the post office !!!

Ha, I hadn't even noticed that!

bazster

What a load of carp. But still don't do anything until you get the first notice in the post.

Notters_the_seagull

bazster wrote: »

What a load of carp. But still don't do anything until you get the first notice in the post.

Right you are.:money:

trisontana

In a similar case involving SSS over on PePiPoo these clowns are trying to claim their day-to-day running expenses as a "loss". Mind you, they are not the only ones. Many PPCs can't seem to be able to get their head round this fact.

Notters_the_seagull

trisontana wrote: »

In a similar case involving SSS over on PePiPoo these clowns are trying to claim their day-to-day running expenses as a "loss". Mind you, they are not the only ones. Many PPCs can't seem to be able to get their head round this fact.

Thanks, yes I saw the other case yesterday. I assume this will make it even easier to fight?

Hovite_2

Notters_the_seagull wrote: »

Thanks, yes I saw the other case yesterday. I assume this will make it even easier to fight?

Indeed. It shows they don't know what a "loss" is - i.e. what money they have lost because YOU broke the "contract". Parking Eye famously went to court and tried to claim for a "wardens" uniform. Of course he would have been naked if the driver hadn't broken the contract !

Notters_the_seagull

Hovite wrote: »

Indeed. It shows they don't know what a "loss" is - i.e. what money they have lost because YOU broke the "contract". Parking Eye famously went to court and tried to claim for a "wardens" uniform. Of course he would have been naked if the driver hadn't broken the contract !

I/the driver certainly won't be admitting to breaking any "contract" as it is.

spacey2012

All Parking companies have CCJ successes .
They get them by issuing proceedings against people who have moved home.
They are automatic default claims.
They dont win any that are defended and the ones they did were very quickly overturned at appeal court.

Notters_the_seagull

spacey2012 wrote: »

All Parking companies have CCJ successes .
They get them by issuing proceedings against people who have moved home.
They are automatic default claims.
They dont win any that are defended and the ones they did were very quickly overturned at appeal court.

This is what I want to hear, thanks.

antrobus

Hovite wrote: »

...The address made me snigger - a small room in a not very nice building and with "Brighton and Hove City" - that isn't a valid postal address. ...!

Looks OK to me. There is a conurbation known as 'Brighton and Hove', and it is a city.

Not that it matters.:)