📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Royal Mail Destroyed my Package

Options
1246

Comments

  • Naresh
    Naresh Posts: 31 Forumite
    edited 17 May 2013 at 3:26PM
    In North London, there are about three post offices close to me and they only started putting up the signs in April 2013.
    Yet the regulations were introduced in Jan 14

    I have had personal property destroyed.
    Ownership of the property had not been transferred to the post office.
    I expected safe passage when I posted the package.
    They have a Duty of Care when they gave me a receipt.
    There has to be some 'unfair' practices act that can help me ?

    The onus of informing the customer of regulation changes is on the Issuer of the changes.
    Anyone with any legal experience able to help a layman seeking justice from a corporate giant ?
  • lucy03
    lucy03 Posts: 520 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    Naresh wrote: »
    It is UNFAIR to expect the customer to check their web site every minute of every day for changes to their restrictions.
    Prior to 14th JAN, perfume was NOT a restricted item.

    They clearly haven't advertised it very well in this instance, but I note from an old Royal Mail leaflet last year it says on it "you are always responsible for checking whether or not an item is restricted". Which, in my view, is what they'll stick by. I'd personally mention that you feel misled and ask for a refund of the postage element.

    But you can take the Royal Mail to the small claims court if you would like to, or at least I recall seeing one person in court doing just that. I remember it because the Royal Mail representative didn't turn up, and they lost by default.
  • Naresh
    Naresh Posts: 31 Forumite
    lucy03 wrote: »
    They clearly haven't advertised it very well in this instance, but I note from an old Royal Mail leaflet last year it says on it "you are always responsible for checking whether or not an item is restricted". Which, in my view, is what they'll stick by. I'd personally mention that you feel misled and ask for a refund of the postage element.

    But you can take the Royal Mail to the small claims court if you would like to, or at least I recall seeing one person in court doing just that. I remember it because the Royal Mail representative didn't turn up, and they lost by default.

    Finally, someone whose post does not make me feel depressed at the sad loss of an innocent bottle of perfume that is routinely sold on ALL airlines during pressurised flights.

    Thank you and Bless you, lucy03.

    I will still need some help with the legalise in small claims court if I am to attempt the massive struggle ahead of me.
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Slowhand wrote: »
    So Custardy you probably remember that on the 14 of January that you were probably in four or five Post Offices that displayed the notice?

    still sticking with this one I see
    well its probably easier for me to say(in my best Bill Clinton tone)
    to the best of my knowledge I dont recollect being in a post office that doesnt display the aforementioned document
    Does that meet your criteria or shall you dig around a bit more?
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Slowhand wrote: »
    You remember being in four or five on that very day? Aye right as we say. Your credibility is going down.

    I guesstimated on the side of caution
    you have no idea what I do on a daily basis, nor what my reasons for being in POs on a daily basis would be
    So your faith in my credibility doesnt even flag on the give-a-damn-ometer
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Naresh wrote: »
    If you buy insurance you get handed a terms and conditions of that insurance policy at the time of purchase. That is the law.

    Have you ever purchased car or other insurance where you have not been made aware of the the Terms and Conditions or who the underwriter of the insurance policy is ?

    Now if you are going to make statements like that,you will be in for a tough time
    state facts,or opinions
    dont however muddy the two to suit
  • Slowhand
    Slowhand Posts: 1,073 Forumite
    custardy wrote: »
    I guesstimated on the side of caution
    you have no idea what I do on a daily basis, nor what my reasons for being in POs on a daily basis would be
    So your faith in my credibility doesnt even flag on the give-a-damn-ometer

    Keep digging. Have you worked or do you work for The Royal Mail/Post Office?
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Slowhand wrote: »
    Keep digging. Have you worked or do you work for The Royal Mail/Post Office?

    yes
    which is no secret on these boards, before you start querying that too
  • Naresh
    Naresh Posts: 31 Forumite
    custardy wrote: »
    yes
    which is no secret on these boards, before you start querying that too

    Since you work for the post office, can you provide a legal insight to how I can get the POSTRS to address airsure.
    Also some help with how to deal the RMG in Small Claims Court would also be helpful.
    Unless of course you are biased in favour of the Post Office and therefore will not be able to help, regardless of whether it is fair or unfair of the post office to have destroyed my package without trying to return it to me.
    When they gave me a receipt and accepted my package, with full knowledge that it contained perfume, they entered into a Duty of Care Contract.
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Naresh wrote: »
    Since you work for the post office, can you provide a legal insight to how I can get the POSTRS to address airsure.
    Also some help with how to deal the RMG in Small Claims Court would also be helpful.
    Unless of course you are biased in favour of the Post Office and therefore will not be able to help, regardless of whether it is fair or unfair of the post office to have destroyed my package without trying to return it to me.
    When they gave me a receipt and accepted my package, with full knowledge that it contained perfume, they entered into a Duty of Care Contract.

    I never said I work for the Post Office
    given you have decided answrs you dont like make me biased,then I will give you one you like

    yes you can take RM/POC to court
    T&Cs are worthless
    You will win

    This seems to be the only answer you will accept
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.