PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Help Damage to Communal Areas by Tenant

13»

Comments

  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    edited 17 May 2013 at 8:11AM
    Oh I hate these sorts of threads:eek::rotfl:GM's post aside.

    1 Block Insurance Claim or your own landlords insurance you'll have to pay for the excess.

    2 Ask the Police for the Crime Reference Number.

    And why oh why on earth would you think that her employer or the letting agent would be liable for her getting drunk? :rotfl:

    If you are going to pursue the tenant, who caused the damage, then send the letter before action and then make the money claim now.
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    Originally Posted by Mercurial viewpost.gif
    The LA have advised the tenant is not responsible for the door and she can't be held responsible for it.

    As its the other flat's door and the breaking down of the door was done by others she has very limited vicarious liability.

    The Police will often reinstate the door in these cases.
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • Mercurial
    Mercurial Posts: 218 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    propertyman thank you that's a great help will get invoices arranged for work to be given to the tenant. I am hoping that the cost of repairs will be deducted from, her deposit. I am working overseas at the moment so may be difficult to chase her for the money.

    Also need to find about the door after 2 months I would have thought the neighbou's door was replaced.
  • maninthestreet
    maninthestreet Posts: 16,127 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    How can the LL be responsible for the actions of the tenant in this situation?
    "You were only supposed to blow the bl**dy doors off!!"
  • CKhalvashi
    CKhalvashi Posts: 12,134 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    How can the LL be responsible for the actions of the tenant in this situation?

    The tenant is responsible for their own actions.

    The issue is that BTL should be viewed as a business rather than an investment; with an investment, you're unlikely to be required to put further funds into its maintenance, with a business you are.

    Unfortunately, OP is liable for the property.

    CK
    💙💛 💔
  • maninthestreet
    maninthestreet Posts: 16,127 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    CKhalvashi wrote: »
    The tenant is responsible for their own actions.

    The issue is that BTL should be viewed as a business rather than an investment; with an investment, you're unlikely to be required to put further funds into its maintenance, with a business you are.

    Unfortunately, OP is liable for the property.

    CK

    Do you have any links to any court cases similar to this case where the LL was held responisble for damage to someone else's property as a result of the actions of their tenant?
    "You were only supposed to blow the bl**dy doors off!!"
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.