Money Grabbing Vet!!!

pseudopensioner

the_flip_side wrote: »

my heart also tells me to treat first, money later, my employer tells me just how big our bad debt problem really is,

Maybe I'm a little naive, but I think this answers the question as to whether the dog was sent away without painkillers without payment 'upfront', and why!:rolleyes:

I merely quoted the vets' own words:D

If I am ever in need of a defence barrister, I hope lokiman is available:D

Of course If I am a plaintiff then I will pray lokiman is not a member of the opposing counsel

dangeroussports

The main point of this entire thread is that Daisy is a dog and she broke her leg and the vet refused the dog pain relieve because he wanted his money prior.

However if we look at this situation from a macro level, holistic point of view, then arent we all just like Daisy ? Arent we all just like the vet? Buddhism teaches us that the universe is in everything and can be viewed in an instant. Is Daisy a byproduct of its owners universe, a universe imposed onto Daisy from its owners reality and reenforced by the vet?

This thread needs to remain at the top.

Optimist

dangeroussports wrote: »

The main point of this entire thread is that Daisy is a dog and she broke her leg and the vet refused the dog pain relieve because he wanted his money prior.

However if we look at this situation from a macro level, holistic point of view, then arent we all just like Daisy ? Arent we all just like the vet? Buddhism teaches us that the universe is in everything and can be viewed in an instant. Is Daisy a byproduct of its owners universe, a universe imposed onto Daisy from its owners reality and reenforced by the vet?

This thread needs to remain at the top.

Good grief ! :T

marleyboy

Optimist wrote: »

Good grief ! :T

I think Ive just worked out who the vet prescribed the medication to :rotfl:

marleyboy

superscaper wrote: »

If that is true then I do apologise but why do people seem to think you are the same person? Obviously I'm not the only one confused. Even dangeroussports implies you're the same person: "maybe were the same person!".

I dont think it is you whom is confused here, it comes under the act of split personalities, a rare condition, but pretty common amongst TROLLS or in this particular case A TROLL!.

Its got something to do with having someone you can relate with or to. If you cant find such a person, as in this case, just create one.

But feeding them, is the cause, not the cure.:D

dangeroussports

You MUST work in I.T

dangeroussports

marleyboy wrote: »

I dont think it is you whom is confused here, it comes under the act of split personalities, a rare condition, but pretty common amongst TROLLS or in this particular case A TROLL!.

Its got something to do with having someone you can relate with or to. If you cant find such a person, as in this case, just create one.

But feeding them, is the cause, not the cure.:D

Maryboy,

With your somewhat 'grassy knoll' and David Icke type reasoning, it could be that YOU are one of my personalities - true?

looby75

Hmmm anyone else think this thread should have died a death a long long time ago? Or is it just me

marleyboy

looby75 wrote: »

Hmmm anyone else think this thread should have died a death a long long time ago? Or is it just me

Im with you Looby