Money Grabbing Vet!!!

Dave_Brooker

superscaper wrote: »

I'm confused. I know dangeroussports is Dave Brooker

You are indeed confused, I only post here under my name, Dave Brooker, nothing else.

superscaper

Dave_Brooker wrote: »

You are indeed confused, I only post here under my name, Dave Brooker, nothing else.

If that is true then I do apologise but why do people seem to think you are the same person? Obviously I'm not the only one confused. Even dangeroussports implies you're the same person: "maybe were the same person!".

dangeroussports

You are George Bush and evil

superscaper

dangeroussports wrote: »

You are George Bush and evil

Still not come up with an example yet?

So far you've equated me to a mass killer, called me a bully, called me George Bush, called me evil, called me sensitive. What have I called you? And you call me the bully?

Dave_Brooker

superscaper wrote: »

If that is true then I do apologise!

Appology accepted.

superscaper wrote: »

but why do people seem to think you are the same person?!"

Mental ilness?

Chesnut1

Thank you Superscraper you understand exactly my point.Dangeroussports I will reply to your question although I have posted this previously. My dogs are INSURED my two horses are not, even though I would prefer this. This is because the older one was seriously ill with a diseeas that if in the very unlikely event they survive Insurance companies will not insure then further incase they get it again so as I said before judging by your comments I should then shoot him rather that keep a uninsured horse(they are insured for public liability just not vets bills). The youngster cannot get insurance due to what the older horse came down with! This is a double standard with the insurance companies but does happen. Furthermore my older horse ran up bills of over £5000 to save his life the vast majority I had to find before the insurance company paid out so again this subject is not as black and white as you think yet you ignore the many reasons why people do not have insurance. As in my case horses were always insured before this but I now cannot get any and it is not for trying but yes the dogs are still insured. But at the end of the day the animals will get treatments/food before I do as has been in the past. So if you want to attack someone try the insurance companies not folk like myself or the OP who was starting a debate about a vet not insurance. Thank you.

superscaper

Dave_Brooker wrote: »

Mental ilness?

It doesn't help when dangeroussports himself implies that he is you.
Well so long as you don't accuse me of being an evil mass killing bully.

dangeroussports

We are all one.
We all lead to the source.

dangeroussports

Chesnut1 wrote: »

Thank you Superscraper you understand exactly my point.Dangeroussports I will reply to your question although I have posted this previously. My dogs are INSURED my two horses are not, even though I would prefer this. This is because the older one was seriously ill with a diseeas that if in the very unlikely event they survive Insurance companies will not insure then further incase they get it again so as I said before judging by your comments I should then shoot him rather that keep a uninsured horse(they are insured for public liability just not vets bills). The youngster cannot get insurance due to what the older horse came down with! This is a double standard with the insurance companies but does happen. Furthermore my older horse ran up bills of over £5000 to save his life the vast majority I had to find before the insurance company paid out so again this subject is not as black and white as you think yet you ignore the many reasons why people do not have insurance. As in my case horses were always insured before this but I now cannot get any and it is not for trying but yes the dogs are still insured. But at the end of the day the animals will get treatments/food before I do as has been in the past. So if you want to attack someone try the insurance companies not folk like myself or the OP who was starting a debate about a vet not insurance. Thank you.

Yes or no will do. I have enough problems of my own without hearing your life story.

taxiphil

dangeroussports wrote: »

Yes or no will do. I have enough problems of my own without hearing your life story.

It was your choice to become heavily involved in this thread.