SSE - £150 + VAT (to deliver letter)

philD_2

chanz4

This will all be shortly verified by solicitors.

philD_2

chanz4 wrote: »

Its service, and doesnt come under the same act

What a beautiful world we are lucky to exist in - flowers, birds butterflies, trees, plants and infinity.

chanz4 - I feel for you - I hope your life is not wasted.

philD_2

chanz4 wrote: »

Its service, and doesnt come under the same act

Chanz4

Not long now - I think you're full of bull. When this is proved I'll speak with you personally.

chanz4

That a threat? P.s I work in the industry

chanz4

philD wrote: »

What a beautiful world we are lucky to exist in - flowers, birds butterflies, trees, plants and infinity.

chanz4 - I feel for you - I hope your life is not wasted.

No people that dont pay bills like you keep me in a job, and entertained

chanz4

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft140.pdf

SwanJon

chanz - it looks to me like Phil is just wanting to kick over an ants nest, and is ignoring any sense that is introduced to the conversation.
We had the diversion around calorific value, now credit facilities.

Saying the charges are unlawful as they do not reflect reasonable/actual charges, but ignoring any question around what would be a reasonable amount? (to believe that the charge is unreasonable you must have a figure in mind that is reasonable)

I'll wait for this to fizzle out when sense gets forced in.

chanz4

oh well he would hate my cost, each visit I do is £300, due to been a rpu

philD_2

chanz4 wrote: »

oh well he would hate my cost, each visit I do is £300, due to been a rpu

My line of work only pays £45/hr (IT Contract market - last 15 years) - I should look at working for an energy company or moving into the legal practice (£165/hr).

However as I say, I'm still waiting for advice and as soon as that materialises then action will be very swift and very precise.

philD_2

SwanJon wrote: »

chanz - it looks to me like Phil is just wanting to kick over an ants nest, and is ignoring any sense that is introduced to the conversation.
We had the diversion around calorific value, now credit facilities.

Saying the charges are unlawful as they do not reflect reasonable/actual charges, but ignoring any question around what would be a reasonable amount? (to believe that the charge is unreasonable you must have a figure in mind that is reasonable)

I'll wait for this to fizzle out when sense gets forced in.

Swanjon

i'm waiting for advice. The charges have been applied - they will be removed shortly either by agreement or court action.

You perceive there is room for negotiation (wrt charges)- this is boolean, they apply or don't apply. My costs now come into the equation.

CV based calculations are for the attention of Ofgem.