📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Thomson Claim 2 years limit to claim

1111214161725

Comments

  • len49
    len49 Posts: 43 Forumite
    You had me worried Vauban but I'm glad to hear that you've kept the faith. I can only hope for a positive outcome but I find it hard to imagine that our learned Judges would have been swayed otherwise.

    len

    To be clear Len, I have said I think Dawson will prevail. But it will be a more finely balanced judgement than most reckon, I bet.[/QUOTE]
  • Skid_Marks
    Skid_Marks Posts: 135 Forumite
    No mention on their Twitter account of the Bott team making an early start to the Court for the judgement on Dawson, as they did with the Huzar appeal when they wanted to capitalise on the outcome........that looks ominous!
  • Star9272
    Star9272 Posts: 99 Forumite
    PPI Party Pooper
    Are the press there?
  • nigelpm
    nigelpm Posts: 433 Forumite
    This is potentially huge for the airlines. I suspect it will go against Dawson because it would be commercially hugely damaging.
  • razorsedge
    razorsedge Posts: 344 Forumite
    edited 19 June 2014 at 10:25AM
    nigelpm wrote: »
    This is potentially huge for the airlines. I suspect it will go against Dawson because it would be commercially hugely damaging.

    Nowhere near as damaging as the recent Huzar appeal!

    Edit: The many legged one beat me too it
    The above is just my opinon - which counts for nowt! You must make up your own mind.
  • nigelpm
    nigelpm Posts: 433 Forumite
    Not as damaging as Huzar, there are fewer claims in excess of 2 years old than there are existing claims from less than 2 years and ongoing due to technical issues.

    Yes, there are fewer claims at the moment.

    However, if Dawson win you'll find thousands more claims coming out of the ether.

    My gut feel says the powers that be won't want that situation occurring.

    Going back 6 years will create a rush for more claims to be filed.

    Huzar was also based on a much clearer legal precedent.
  • The airlines will win for the simple reason if they lose I get a bite of the cherry and I'm not usually lucky when it comes to that.
  • Star9272
    Star9272 Posts: 99 Forumite
    PPI Party Pooper
    I imagine there are fewer claims at the moment because the strategy the airlines took worked
    Defend defend defend
  • razorsedge
    razorsedge Posts: 344 Forumite
    edited 19 June 2014 at 10:30AM
    nigelpm wrote: »

    My gut feel says the powers that be won't want that situation occurring.

    Who are the powers that be? The airlines?

    Judges should (and I would say most likely do) take into account the law as it is to make a ruling, not the economic (or administrative) consequences of the ruling.
    The above is just my opinon - which counts for nowt! You must make up your own mind.
  • Vauban
    Vauban Posts: 4,737 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    BREAKING NEWS! Bott&Co wins 2nd Court of Appeal case confirming flight delay claims can go back 6 years. #DawsonvThomson

    Bott wins again!!!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.