We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Contactless Cards

123578

Comments

  • dalesrider wrote: »
    Well as you spend your money, then you are best placed to spot fraud..
    As well as ALL banks have security systems in place.
    Yes I am. The point is that its stupid to add a vulnerability to my card if I'm not going to use the new feature. I don't see why I should take on the responsibility for something I don't want.
    dalesrider wrote: »
    Public opinion is people want contactless cards.
    The majority of my friends and people I work with don't want them at all.
    dalesrider wrote: »
    Gusgorman.
    Are you aware that the biggest weakness in ALL card payments is the retailers that take the payments.
    They take anyone off the street and allow them access to card details. With NO security checks.
    To work in a bank, you have to be fully security screened.
    Yet anyone can be pulled off the streets and have access to card details in a retailer....
    Perhaps you need to turn your attention. To the real problem area :mad:
    Yes - there are existing security vulnerabilities, some bigger, some smaller, I accept that. The point is that it is stupid to add extra vulnerabilities to my card if I'm not going to use the new features.

    And - if the biggest weakness is the retailers then its pretty stupid to add a feature that makes it even easier for them to commit fraud.
  • stclair wrote: »
    Just opt out and be done with it.
    .

    Some banks are forcing their customers to have contactless cards. There is no opt out option.
  • pmduk
    pmduk Posts: 10,683 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 14 February 2013 at 12:00PM
    Nobody forces a customer to stay with a bank that gives them facilities they don't want.
  • pmduk wrote: »
    Nobody forces a customer to stay with a bank that gives them facilities they don't want.

    Are you thick, all banks will adopt this and force it on everyone eventually.. like it or not. The changes are being led by mastercard & visa, who want to replace cash with their system. Why is that good or acceptable?
  • Hooloovoo
    Hooloovoo Posts: 1,281 Forumite
    edited 14 February 2013 at 1:42PM
    FireWyrm wrote: »
    As I said and no one seems to understand...

    It's you that doesn't understand.
    Individually, each person loses £20 or £80 depending on your individual card limits. Collectively, a scanner mingles in a busy high street on a Saturday morning and swipes HUNDREDS of £20's....do you get it yet?
    So they've got this "scanner" and when they "scan" someone to take £20 from them, a £20 note pops out of the scanner does it?

    No. Of course not. The criminal would require a merchant account, just like a shop requires. When all the £20s are transferred to the merchants account, and they are all reported as fraudulent, just how long do you think that account will stay active? Not to mention they would have to somehow launder that money from the merchant account into a personal account to make it untraceable.

    Also you misunderstand how this "scanner" could possibly work. You are correct that passive RFID can be made to work at distances of several metres. The RFID chip gets its power by inducing a current from the radio signal, and uses that power to send its own pre-programmed identification data. The communication is purely one-way.

    But contactless cards are not passive RFID. They are not the same as an Oyster card or a pet ID tag, for example. It's a different type of RFID that requires the card to be actively powered while two-way communication takes place. This is done by inducing a current using magnetic coupling, which the laws of physics prove can only occur over very very short range.

    It's simply not possible to build the "scanner" of which you speak. And even if it were possible, it would be impossible to steal any money using a completely untraceable method.
  • stclair
    stclair Posts: 6,855 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    gusgorman wrote: »
    Some banks are forcing their customers to have contactless cards. There is no opt out option.

    Which ones are these could you elaborate?
    Im an ex employee RBS Group
    However Any Opinion Given On MSE Is Strictly My Own
  • stclair wrote: »
    Which ones are these could you elaborate?

    To be honest Co-operative bank is the only one I know for sure. When customers debit cards expire they are sending them a contactless one as a replacement with no opt out option.
  • stclair
    stclair Posts: 6,855 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    gusgorman wrote: »
    To be honest Co-operative bank is the only one I know for sure. When customers debit cards expire they are sending them a contactless one as a replacement with no opt out option.

    How do you know their is no opt out option?
    Im an ex employee RBS Group
    However Any Opinion Given On MSE Is Strictly My Own
  • stclair wrote: »
    How do you know their is no opt out option?
    Because I bank with them, I asked them, and they told me.
  • You're completely 110% overreacting on something so silly IMHO.

    Right say someone now steel £80 off you from Contactless payments out of your account(100% unlikely) the bank will just reinburse you so I don't think you get it.

    Move on & stop worrying.


    I think this is a touch naive. I remember when cash point cards were first introduced. My BIL had several withdrawals against his card which he reported to the bank as he had not done them. The bank refused to accept that this had happened. He could prove that he was not even in the town centre when some of the withdrawals took place as it was at work, 20 miles away. The bank's answer to this was that he must have given his card and pin to a friend.

    A few months later, two transactions too place within 5 minutes of each other but in locations 20 miles apart. At this point, the bank accepted that there was a problem and he was finally refunded the money.

    You may think that the bank will just refund you, just like that. But the onus will be on you to prove that you did not spend the money. Its very difficult to prove that you haven't done something.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.