We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Govt Defeated-Cons Losing Election More Likely

2456710

Comments

  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Likewise where do Labour voters show their discontent with poor leadership?

    Fair point.

    I guess the answer is....they can't, and don't.

    Unless they go down the lib dem route...
  • RJP33
    RJP33 Posts: 339 Forumite
    epz wrote: »
    Yay, it a victory for the self interest of MPs over democracy.

    Regardless of political persuasion the principle of one man one vote is generally accepted as a good one. It becomes pretty meaningless when one persons vote is worth less than someone living in a different area whos MP is elected on a much smaller constituency.
    This exactly, it's a vote against democracy but in their interests. If it changes and Scotland leave they're in all sorts of problems.

    Still, if the economy recovers by 2015 then it could get very close.
  • Fella
    Fella Posts: 7,921 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    As I've posted before, in the last 62 years only two Labour leaders have won a General Election: Harold Wilson & Tony Blair.

    Considering Ed Miliband is perhaps their least impressive leader either, I certainly wouldn't be calling him a certainty to be the 3rd in 65 years.
  • toby3000
    toby3000 Posts: 316 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Fella wrote: »
    As I've posted before, in the last 62 years only two Labour leaders have won a General Election: Harold Wilson & Tony Blair.

    Considering Ed Miliband is perhaps their least impressive leader either, I certainly wouldn't be calling him a certainty to be the 3rd in 65 years.

    And I think that Anthony Eden is the only Conservative party leader to increase their share of the vote. You think Dave is the man to buck the trend?
  • chris_m
    chris_m Posts: 8,250 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 31 January 2013 at 8:39AM
    Fella wrote: »
    As I've posted before, in the last 62 years only two Labour leaders have won a General Election: Harold Wilson & Tony Blair.

    Only four have ever, unless I've miscounted - if you add MacDonald (but not outright in either election) and Attlee
  • Fella
    Fella Posts: 7,921 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    toby3000 wrote: »
    And I think that Anthony Eden is the only Conservative party leader to increase their share of the vote. You think Dave is the man to buck the trend?

    Yes he could be. Cameron has consistently been more popular both than his own party and Ed Miliband.


    YouGov's latest "best PM" rating this month:


    Cameron 33
    Miliband 23(-2),
    Clegg 7 (+2)


    A remarkable achievement considering the level of dissatisfaction with most things. Cameron is an asset not a liability. Miliband is also an asset. To the Tories.
  • BertieUK
    BertieUK Posts: 1,701 Forumite
    I wonder how the Bookies will come up with the betting odds for the next Election in just over two years time because in reality when you look at the figures that show the results of the last election there are an awful lot of people that did not vote...


    Cons with 10.7m
    Labs with 8.6m
    Libs with 6.8m
    Total of votes 26.1

    Considering that at the time there were something like 46m people eligible to vote how can anyone judge who will win?

    Many people think that the Liberals are almost history after the Coalition so there could be suprises on the horizon.
  • A lot of it will all depend on where the hoards of disaffected Lib Dem voters will go.

    Chances are many of them are more likely to go to Labour than the way of the tories.
  • Treadmill
    Treadmill Posts: 1,102 Forumite
    Billy Bragg voted Lib Dem in the last election, I doubt him and millions of other left leaning voters will for for Clegg again. Cons don't stand a chance of getting a majority, bye bye Dave.
  • Fella
    Fella Posts: 7,921 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    That's if Clegg is in charge by then. Could be Cable.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.