It cannot be right (Sun £9.50 train vouchers)

qetu1357

that those who buy the Sun have no chance of getting them because people who don't buy the Sun have grabbed them all the day before, can it?

Discuss

pmduk

It's not a loyalty offer, that would require the collection of vouchers. It's for whoever buys the relevant issues. First come first served.

It would take more than a cheap rail ticket get me to buy that rag.

qetu1357

pmduk wrote: »

It's not a loyalty offer, that would require the collection of vouchers. It's for whoever buys the relevant issues. First come first served.

It would take more than a cheap rail ticket get me to buy that rag.

But that's my point.

It's been snapped up by people who haven't bought the papers.

ivavoucher

You wouldn't want sun readers armed with travel documents would you, best to keep them static I say.

qetu1357

Ahh such snobbery towards Sun readers.............

If you look at the readership mix you will see that the Sun has more readers from the higher socioeconomic groups that the Guardian....

LunaLady

qetu1357 wrote: »

Ahh such snobbery towards Sun readers.............

If you look at the readership mix you will see that the Sun has more readers from the higher socioeconomic groups that the Guardian....

Really? Do you have those statistics?

qetu1357

LunaLady wrote: »

Really? Do you have those statistics?

Sure do

http://www.nrs.co.uk/toplinereadership.html

Click on newspapers

The Sun 2560k ABC1 readers The Guardian 950k.

pmduk

qetu1357 wrote: »

Ahh such snobbery towards Sun readers.............

Not snobbery, more common sense. Particularly when you consider it's part of News International.

qetu1357

pmduk wrote: »

Not snobbery, more common sense. Particularly when you consider it's part of News International.

So you have the same snobbery/common sense against readers of the Sunday Times and people who view Sky Arts?

System

qetu1357 wrote: »

Sure do

http://www.nrs.co.uk/toplinereadership.html

Click on newspapers

The Sun 2560k ABC1 readers The Guardian 950k.

Its still a terrible paper.

qetu1357

goater78 wrote: »

Its still a terrible paper.

In your opinion.

7 million readers obviously think different.