We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Buying a house with tenant on Periodic Tenancy?
Comments
-
kanute 50. The reason the tenant changes gender so often is that we are talking about a woman and her son. Sometimes the woman is representative and sometimes the man.
Werdnal: Thank you again. You are right in saying I know little about being a landlord. I didn't want to be one but got caught, and that was what I was trying to caution Mike3 against when I first posted. The fact that we are almost certainly talking about my tenant is a pure fluke, and the story Mike3 has got (apparently from my tenant) is either a tall story or my tenant is also resident of another property which will serve his purpose equally well - and if he is I would like to know where that property is because I believe he (and his mother) is a social security claimant working a fraudulent claim - or even several fraudulent claims. He seems also to be good at paper forgery.
Additionally, if Mike3 is not also spinning a yarn about an auction on the 6th Feb. then my tenant has probably set him up to part with a large sum of money for a property that is not his to sell on the 6th Feb.
I wish Mike3 would come back and tell us more. It could be invaluable to me.0 -
Wow, I must say metropolitanlandlord I don't think were not talking about the same person. There is no woman involved only a father and son, I didn't pick up on the she bit. Forgive me but seeing the anagram of his name I was quick to reply. Some really useful points on here and I only have one more question - if the tenant lived in the house for 35 years but only became a tenant in 2007 (after previously owning the property) does he have a protected tenancy even though it states 6 months with one months notice either way on the tenancy. As stated I'm not going to kick him out but I'm asking for future and because this thread is picking up more interest and I suspect more of these problems will occur for others in the future.
Thanks all
Mike0 -
But regardless of what is written in the Tenancy agreement, there is no such thing as "one month's notice either way" - notice requirements on an SPT are 1 month from the tenant, and notice seeking possession (not notice to end the tenancy) from the landlord of 2 months, followed by a court possession application if the tenant does not leave.
This has been covered in length in previous replies and the linked thread in GM's response above. Read again and do try to keep up ...0 -
But regardless of what is written in the Tenancy agreement, there is no such thing as "one month's notice either way" - notice requirements on an SPT are 1 month from the tenant, and notice seeking possession (not notice to end the tenancy) from the landlord of 2 months, followed by a court possession application if the tenant does not leave.
This has been covered in length in previous replies and the linked thread in GM's response above. Read again and do try to keep up ...1 month from the tenant...
(but I know you know that and are just using shorthand which is fine as it is pretty irrelevant to this thread anyway which is way past its sell-by date.... the basic advice is, and always has been, buy this property at your peril and make sure you know what you are doing.)
Which the OP don't!0 -
No idea who is scamming who in this thread but metropolitanlandlord's tenant started out as a "she' and is now allegedly a man in his 60s called Albert. What's more Mike3 didn't notice the sex change. What an odd lot LOL.
Anyway thanks for wasting our time guys!
Apologies, didn't want to waste anyone's time I'm greatful for the advice you have offered and will report back as promised. As per my last post I only saw the anagram of the name and jumped on it, I missed the sex comment.
Anyhow I'm fairly confident I'm not buying from his tenants!0 -
Keep up yourself werdnall!
Beggin yer pardon sir (have we got a "tug-forelock" smilie).
Tenant should give 1 full tenancy period!
However, in reply to Mike3's post, "1 month either way" that he quoted was the term I was attempting to correct, and for the purposes of my reply, I'm sure it would have got my point across.
However, as usual I bow to your greater knowledge and your intention to get things 100% correct and legal of course.0 -
Werdnall, the question hasn't been answered perhaps I'm not asking correctly. As he has been there before 1989, does this mean he has a protected tenancy. By that I mean he lived there before 89 but was the owner and not a tenant.
If you don't know its not a problem I will speak with sols tomorrow.
Mike0 -
The only thing is - how do you know there is no woman? Is that just because Mr. Albert s (one letter missed out) has told you, or is there some other way you know? In my experience he will tell any lie that suits his purpose, and he may have two or more addresses.
When I first contacted you I told you I had a tenant and her son living in my house. Sometimes I talked about her and sometimes about him.
As you are not going to buy the house, would you be willing to let me know the address so that I can eliminate further anxieties about my own house?
I am not as convinced as you that it is not my tenant or her son.0 -
Werdnall, the question hasn't been answered perhaps I'm not asking correctly. As he has been there before 1989, does this mean he has a protected tenancy. By that I mean he lived there before 89 but was the owner and not a tenant.
If you don't know its not a problem I will speak with sols tomorrow.
Mike
I am far from expert in such matters, but IMO, his rights as a tenant started from the point where he became a tenant. It is very unlikely his years as "owner/occupier" would give him any more leverage for any additional rights now.
Check out out with your solicitor just to be sure.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards